Spondylodiscitis and vertebral osteomyelitis can lead to long-term sequelae if not diagnosed and treated promptly and appropriately. The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH) has devised a new spinal infection referral system within the UK that allows cases to be discussed in a specialist multi-disciplinary (MDT) forum. National guidelines were devised in 2013 to help guide treatment, which recommends both tissue biopsies from the affected region and a MRI of the entire spine. The aims of this study were to assess the current treatment and referral practices and compare them with the set guidelines. It is hypothesised that a high percentage of patients are started on antibiotics without a biopsy or a positive set of blood cultures, a low percentage of patients are referred without undergoing a MRI of the full spine and that there is a long delay in referral to the MDT. A retrospective case study analysis was carried out on all spinal infection referrals received by the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital over a 2-year period (2014–16), using the standards set by the current national guidelines. Clinical features, haematology results, imaging, biopsy results, treatment and outcome were all reviewed. Three key areas were addressed; whether antibiotics were commenced before positive cultures or biopsy, whether a MRI of the entire spine was performed and the time taken for referral from the onset of symptoms.Aim
Method
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a powerful technique for correcting sagittal imbalance in ankylosing spondylitis. There has been significant perioperative morbidity associated with this technique in the peer review literature. We present the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital experience with a single surgeon retrospective study that was conducted to evaluate the outcomes in patients who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Twenty seven patients underwent a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy and adjacent level posterior instrumentation between 1995 and 2010. There were 18 males and 9 females in the study. Events during the peri-operative course and post-operative complications were recorded. The radiological outcome and patient satisfaction were analysed with mean follow-up of one and a half years.Introduction
Method
