The purpose of this multi-center, randomized clinical trial was to compare static and articulating spacers in the treatment of PJI complicating total knee arthroplasty TKA. 68 Patients treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty were randomized to either a static (32 patients) or an articulating (36 patients) spacer. A power analysis determined that 28 patients per group were necessary to detect a 13º difference in range of motion between groups. Six patients were excluded after randomization, six died, and seven were lost to follow-up prior to two years.Background
Methods
In the setting of a “dry” aspiration, saline lavage is commonly used to obtain a sample for analysis. The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the impact of saline lavage on synovial fluid markers in revision arthroplasty. 79 patients undergoing revision hip (19) and knee (60) arthroplasty were enrolled. Intraoperatively, prior to arthrotomy, the maximum amount of fluid possible was aspirated to simulate a dry-tap (“pre-lavage”) followed by subsequent injection with 20 mL of normal saline and re-aspiration (“post-lavage”). Pre and post-lavage synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, percent polymorphonuclear cells (%PMN), and cultures were compared. Statistical analyses utilized the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Background
Methods
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is proven to reduce blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there are limited data on the impact of similar dosing regimens in revision TKA. The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to determine the optimal regimen to maximize the blood-sparing properties of TXA in revision TKA. From six-centres, 233 revision TKAs were randomized to one of four regimens: 1 g of intravenous (IV) TXA given prior to the skin incision, a double-dose regimen of 1 g IV TXA given both prior to skin incision and at time of wound closure, a combination of 1 g IV TXA given prior to skin incision and 1 g of intraoperative topical TXA, or three doses of 1950 mg oral TXA given two hours preoperatively, six hours postoperatively, and on the morning of postoperative day one. Randomization was performed based on the type of revision procedure to ensure equivalent distribution among groups. Power analysis determined that 40 patients per group were necessary to identify a 1 g/dl difference in the reduction of haemoglobin postoperatively between groups with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.80. Per-protocol analysis involved regression analysis and two one-sided Aims
Patients and Methods
