The risk of dislocation in large diameter metal on metal hip replacement is significantly lower than in standard THR. This is due to the increased primary arc, increased jump distance and possibly a suction effect. Our unit has performed over 1500 of these cases with an overall revision rate of <1%. We report a case series of dislocations in 5 large diameter metal on metal hips undertaken at our unit. All cases were reduced closed and investigated for cause of dislocation. Radiological investigation included plain film radiographs and CT to exclude component mal-position and MRI to document soft tissue deficiency. Metal ion levels were measured and microbiological investigation was undertaken.INTRODUCTION
METHOD
