There is substantial concern about the state of musculoskeletal knowledge of junior doctors. There are also marked differences in the locomotor curricula of medical schools, raising the possibility that students may be selectively disadvantaged from gaining appropriate knowledge and/or attaining a musculoskeletal career path. The aims of this study were to assess the musculoskeletal knowledge of newly qualified doctors in the south of Scotland, and to compare this between the two medical schools (Glasgow and Edinburgh) that have different locomotor teaching programmes.

All final year medical students, from Glasgow and Edinburgh Universities (n=158 and 221, respectively), attending the compulsory ‘Preparation for Practice’ lecture course immediately after (Glasgow) or before (Edinburgh) final exams, were assessed by the Freedman and Bernstein musculoskeletal examination, previously validated with two different pass-standards: (i) 73.1% (by orthopaedic surgeons), and (ii) 70% (by physicians).

There was a significant difference (Wilcoxon two sample test; p<0.5×10⁻⁹) in the marks obtained at the two institutions, the median being 59% (IQR 50–67%) and 68% (IQR 60–76%) at Glasgow and Edinburgh respectively. The pass-rates for the two institutions (Glasgow vs. Edinburgh) were markedly different, being 17.1% vs. 32.6% for the higher pass-mark, and 21.5% vs. 48% for the lower.

The majority of newly qualified doctors in the south of Scotland have inadequate musculoskeletal knowledge. There is a substantial and statistically significant difference in the scores attained by students from two neighbouring medical schools (Glasgow and Edinburgh). The striking difference in the pass-rates can be best explained by differences in respective musculoskeletal courses. These explicit and comparative deficits raise substantial questions for musculoskeletal curriculum planning, teaching, assessment and quality assurance.