Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1431 - 1437
1 Nov 2019
Harrison-Brown M Scholes C Ebrahimi M Field C Cordingley R Kerr D Farah S Kohan L

Aims

It is not known whether change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over time can be predicted by factors present at surgery, or early follow-up. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with changes in PROM status between two-year evaluation and medium-term follow-up.

Patients and Methods

Patients undergoing Birmingham Hip Resurfacing completed the Veteran’s Rand 36 (VR-36), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Tegner Activity Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at two years and a minimum of three years. A change in score was assessed against minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between patient factors and deterioration in PASS status between follow-ups.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 1 | Pages 113 - 120
1 Jan 2019
Scholes CJ Ebrahimi M Farah SB Field C Cordingley R Kerr D Kohan L

Aims

The aim of this study was to report the implant survival and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a consecutive series of patients aged less than 50 years at the time of arthroplasty using the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system (BHR), with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Patients and Methods

A total of 226 patients with osteoarthritis of the hip, who underwent BHR and presented to a single surgeon, were included in the study. Survival of the implant was confirmed by cross-checking with the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Kaplan–Meier survival curves with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed. Pre- and postoperative PROMs were compared with t-tests, and postoperative scores were compared using anchor analysis with age and gender matched normative data.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1648 - 1653
1 Dec 2010
Cordingley R Kohan L Ben-Nissan B

The major advantage of hip resurfacing is the decreased amount of bone resection compared with a standard total hip replacement. Fracture of the femoral neck is the most common early complication and poor bone quality is a major risk factor. We undertook a prospective consecutive case control study examining the effect of bone mineral density changes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing surgery. A total of 423 patients were recruited with a mean age of 54 years (24 to 87). Recruitment for this study was dependent on pre-operative bilateral femoral bone mineral density results not being osteoporotic. The operated and non-operated hips were assessed. Bone mineral density studies were repeated over a two-year period. The results showed no significant deterioration in the bone mineral density in the superolateral region in the femoral neck, during that period.

These findings were in the presence of a markedly increased level of physical activity, as measured by the short-form 36 health survey physical function score.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 468 - 468
1 Apr 2004
Kohan L Cordingley R Ben-Nissan B
Full Access

Introduction This prospective outcome study presents the results and complications of 41 lateral unicompartmental knee joint replacements.

Methods One surgeon operated on all the patients in this series. The surgery was performed through minimally invasive techniques wtih the patients being day-stay or overnight stay patients. Assessment was made using SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires, physical examination, x-ray pre-operatively and at six monthly intervals. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out.

Results Forty-one knees (39 patients) underwent surgery. There were 15 males (average age 64 years) and 26 females (average age 68 years). Mean follow-up time was 3.2 years (max 4.6 years). Of these four were Repicci inlay components, 10 were Repicci onlay components and 28 were Oxford mobile bearing implants. Three patients required reoperation, all having mobile bearings in place. One required revision to total knee replacement for progression of arthritis in the medial compartment, and two for bearing dislocation. The operation consisted of a change of bearing to a thicker one. One of these patients had a further complication, a deep infection which was treated successfully with arthroscopic debridement and antibiotics. Another of the mobile bearing patients had a DVT. WOMAC and SF36 show a reduction in pain and stiffness, and an increase in physical function and quality of life. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows 100% survival of the fixed implants but 96% in the mobile bearing group. However 11% of the mobile bearing group required reoperation.

Conclusions Lateral compartment replacement is a technically demanding procedure. This study looks at the early results, and does not examine long-term wear. A significant difference in the complication rates for the different type of implant is noted, with the mobile bearing having a higher reoperation rate.

In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 289 - 289
1 Nov 2002
Kohan L Cordingley R Stanners S
Full Access

Introduction: Bone fragility is a result of the reduction in bone mineral density and mass. This reduction directly reduces the effectiveness of trabecular cross bracing. The problem of femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing surgery is directly related to the mechanical load on the osteoporotic bone.

Aim: To determine any correlation between the degree of osteoporous and subsequent femoral neck fractures.

Methods: A comparison was made between both femoral necks in the same patient, to determine the degree of osteoporosis prior to surgery. These results were then compared with subsequent changes in osteoporosis 12 months post-operatively.

Bone mineral density values, were used to compare the non-operative femoral neck to the operative femoral neck before surgery. These values were then used as a predictive risk of subsequent femoral neck fracture in this patient group. Bone mineral density assessments were repeated 12 months after the surgery to compare the subsequent changes in the osteoporotic values. The bone mineral density evaluations were carried out on one hundred patients, both male and female between the ages of 28 and 87 years. The criterion for entry into this group was a bone mineral density value of no lower than 1.5 standard deviation points below the young reference value.

Results: We found an improvement in the bone mineral density values for each patient, therefore reducing the risks of subsequent femoral neck fracture.