Background

Non-operative cases of mallet finger can be followed up by the hand therapists. Both trust and national policies encourage appropriate indication for follow-up in fracture clinic & cost-effective approach without affecting the patient care.

Scaphoid fractures accounts for approximately 15% of all fractures of hand and wrist. Proximal pole fractures represent 10–20% of scaphoid fractures. Non –operative treatment shows high incidence of non-union and avascular necrosis. Surgical intervention with bone graft is associated with better outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological and functional outcome of management of proximal pole scaphoid non-union with internal fixation and bone grafting.

We included 35 patients with proximal pole scaphoid non-union (2008–2015). All patients underwent antegrade headless compression screw fixation and bone grafting at King's College Hospital, London (except one, who was fixed with Kirschner wire). 33 patients had bone graft from distal radius and two from iliac crest. Postoperatively patients were treated in plaster for 6–8 weeks, followed by splinting for 4–6 weeks and hand physiotherapy. All the patients were analysed at the final follow-up using DASH score and x-rays.

Mean age of the patients was 28 years (20–61) in 32 men and 3 women. We lost three patients (9%) to follow up. At a mean follow up of 16 weeks (12–18) twenty three patients (66%) achieved radiological union. All patients but three (91%) achieved good functional outcome at mean follow up of 14 weeks (10–16).

A good functional outcome can be achieved with surgical fixation and bone graft in proximal pole scaphoid fractures non-union. Pre-operative fragmentation of proximal pole dictates type of fixation (screw or k wire or no fixation). There was no difference in outcome whether graft was harvested from distal radius or iliac crest.

The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is one of the key link joints between the proximal and the distal carpal rows. We assessed the relationship between the scaphotrapezium (STm) andscaphotrapezoid (STd) joints using computerised tomographyand hypothesised the ratio of STm is =/< STd joint due to which, the possibility of failure of trapeziectomy due to metacarpal collapse is insignificant. We reviewed CT scans of wrist joints of 113 eligible patientsfrom our wrist database between 2009 and 2014 for our study. 31 patients were randomised for interobserver correlation. Reformatted multi-planar sequences were analysed. The ratio of theSTm: STdin sagittal and coronal measurementswas evaluated. Interobserver variations were assessed using the Pearson coefficient.

The sex distribution included 68 males and 29 females, 49 left and 64 right wrists. The STm area was larger in 86 (76%) as compared to STd in 27(24%). Average trapezium to trapezoid ratio was 1:1.5. Ratio of area of trapezium: trapezoid joint is 0.30. The anatomic ratio of the STm in the coronal and sagittal planesis 0.3 and that of the STd joint is 0.2. Ratio of the STm: STd in the coronal plane is 0.29. Pearson's coefficient > 0.8.

A small subset of patients undergoing trapeziectomy alonefor stage II- IV carpometacarpal arthritis of the thumb are at risk of impingement of the first metacarpal due to collapse. Our assessment of the anatomical relationship of the STT joint with CT scan proves that although the area the STm joint is generally larger than the STd joint, there is no significant correlation on the whole.

29 cases of complex elbow injuries were reviewed at a mean period of 15 months. Outcome measures included MEPS and DASH score. Patients who had defined early surgery were significantly better than those in whom surgery was delayed. We concluded that Management of complex elbow injuries can be improved by early definitive surgery. The magnitude and type of soft tissue injuries should be identified. MRI scans should be liberally used for this purpose. We believe that early, adequate and appropriate management of soft tissue injuries including use of articulated external fixator for early mobilisation improves the outcome of complex elbow injuries.

Lunate or perilunate dislocations are common carpal injuries. Current treatment of these injuries by repair or reconstruction of intra-carpal ligaments is largely based on Mayfield's description of sequential failure of these ligaments.

We do treat significant number of these injuries. We have observed that dorsal wrist capsule is attached to dorsal aspect of proximal carpal row and its interosseous ligaments by vertically oriented identifiable fibres. This can be seen as carpal bones suspended from dorsal capsule, akin to cloths suspended from a washing line. We have also observed that in lunate or perilunate dislocations, dorsal capsule is peeled off from the dorsal aspect of lunate and distal radius, similar to a Bankart lesion in the shoulder. We believe that dorsal capsule plays a bigger role in the stabilising mechanism of carpal bone than the intercarpal ligaments. It has not been described before.

We dissected three cadaveric wrists and found vertical fibres running from dorsal wrist capsule/ligaments to the dorsal components of the scapholunate and lunotriquetralinterosseous ligaments. We have modified the Mayo approach to dorsal wrist capsule and use suture anchors to attach dorsal capsule/ligaments to scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum rather than repairing intra-carpal ligament. We have used this technique in 26 patients so far. Follow up for more than 4 years have shown satisfactory results and no significant recurrence of instability.

We present a novel, so far unreported, method of repairing the intracarpal injuries, using the dorsal capsule/ligaments, based on anatomic and intra-operative observations.

Suture anchors have gained popularity in recent years, particularly owing to their ease of use for attaching soft tissues to bone and improved biomechanical properties. Three methods to reattach avulsed finger flexor tendons to the distal phalanx were biomechanically compared: a 1.8mm metal Mitek barbed suture anchor, twin 1.3mm PLA suture anchors (Microfix), or a pull-out suture over a button. The suture-anchor interface was tested by pulling the suture at 0, 45, 90° to the anchor's axis. The anchors were tested similarly in plastic foam bone substitute. Repairs of transected tendons in cadaveric fingers were loaded cyclically, then to failure.

The results were subject to statistical analysis using Student t test (p< 0.001) and 1-way ANOVA (p<0.0001). The suture failed prematurely if pulled across the axis of the anchor. Conversely, fixation in bone substitute was stronger when pulling at an angle from the axis. Cyclic loads caused significantly more gap formation in-vitro with twin 1.3mm anchors than the other methods; this method was significantly weaker. The 1.8mm anchor gave similar performance to the pull-out suture and button, while the twin 1.3mm anchors were weaker and vulnerable to gap formation even with passive motion alone.

A suture anchor embedded at between 45 and 90o to the direction of pull gave greater strength than if the pull was in-line. The absorbable 1.3 mm Microfix PLA anchors appeared to be a weak construct, even when twin 1.3 mm anchors were compared to a single metallic 1.8 mm Mitek anchor or the pull-out suture over button technique. All three methods are likely to be satisfactory for reattachment of finger flexor tendons if a low load or non-loading rehabilitation of the hand is planned; however the gap formation on cyclic loading with the Microfix is a concern even if patients are restricted to passive motion.