Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 8 | Pages 569 - 575
1 Aug 2021
Bouguennec N Robinson J Douiri A Graveleau N Colombet PD

Aims

MRI has been suggested as an objective method of assessing anterior crucate ligament (ACL) graft “ligamentization” after reconstruction. It has been proposed that the MRI appearances could be used as an indicator of graft maturity and used as part of a return-to-sport assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between MRI graft signal and postoperative functional scores, anterior knee laxity, and patient age at operation.

Methods

A consecutive cohort of 149 patients who had undergone semitendinosus autograft ACL reconstruction, using femoral and tibial adjustable loop fixations, were evaluated retrospectively postoperatively at two years. All underwent MRI analysis of the ACL graft, performed using signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) and the Howell score. Functional outcome scores (Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective, and IKDC objective) were obtained and all patients underwent instrumented side-to-side anterior laxity differential laxity testing.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 576 - 576
1 Aug 2008
Robinson JR Colombet PD
Full Access

Background: Studies have shown that normal tibio-femoral rotational kinematics is not regained following single-bundle ACL reconstruction and that 14–30% of patients may have a residual “pivot glide”. It has been suggested that 2-bundle reconstruction could better control this laxity, but this not been demonstrated conclusively in-vivo. This study tested the hypothesis that 2-bundle ACL reconstruction improves the control of the Pivot Shift.

Methods: We measured the mean maximum tibial translation and coupled rotation occurring during the pivot shift (using a previously validated surgical navigation based methodology) in 35 consecutive patients undergoing hamstrings ACL reconstruction. 17 patients had a standard single-bundle reconstruction and 18 patients a 4-tunnel, 2-bundle reconstruction. 10 pivot shift tests were performed pre- and post operatively by a single operator and the differences compared.

Results: The two groups were equally age and sex matched. There was no difference in pre-operative pivot shift measurements. 2-bundle reconstruction decreased the tibial rotation occurring with the pivot shift test more than single-bundle reconstruction (Table 1). There was no detectable difference in the control of tibial translation.

Conclusions: This study quantifies, in-vivo, the differences between single and 2-bundle ACL reconstruction in controlling pivot shift. It suggests that anatomic, 2-bundle ACL reconstructions could reduce pivot instability more effectively than a single-bundle. Whether the 10% additional control of the rotational component of the pivot improves functional stability or is necessary every patient and, in the longer term, limits the development of gonarthrosis secondary to abnormal motions, remains to be seen