header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 341 - 341
1 Nov 2002
Quinlan JF Mullett H Coffey L FitzPatrick D McCormack. D
Full Access

Cervical orthoses are currently used in the pre-hospital stabilization of trauma patients and also as part of the definitive non-operative treatment of injuries of the cervical spine. The construct stability of orthoses is compromised by virtue of the fact that the cervical spine exhibits the greatest range of movement amongst the spinal segments and also because of the complex composite nature of neck movements.

To date, data has been difficult to attain comparing the various orthoses, in the various planes of movement of the cervical spine. Various methods including the use of inclinometers, goniometers, radiography, computerized tomography and cineroentgenography have been used in an attempt to measure these movements but none have provided satisfactory triplanar data.

This paper uses the Zebris ultrasonic 3-D motion analysis system to measure flexion, extension, range of lateral bending and range of axial rotation in five similar male and five similar female subjects with no history of neck injuries. The subjects were tested in a soft and hard collar, Philadelphia, Miami J and Minerva.

Results show that the Minerva is significantly the most stable construct for restriction of movement in all planes in both groups (p< 0.002 vs. all groups, Student’s t-test), but more impressively in the female group. In the male group, the standard hard collar performs second best in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation. In the female group, the second most stable orthosis is the Philadelphia in flexion/extension and the hard collar in lateral bending and axial rotation (p< 0.05 vs. next most stable in all cases, Student’s t-test). The soft collar in both groups offered only minimal resistance to movement in any plane, e. g. 45.07° vs. 46.45° extension vs. normal in males and 40.15° vs. 41.8° extension vs. normal in females.

Looking at these results together allows the ranking of the measured orthoses in order of the three-dimensional stability they offer. Furthermore, they validate the Zebris as a reliable and safe method of measurement of the complex movements of the cervical spine with low intersubject variability.

In conclusion, this paper, for the first time presents reproducible data incorporating the composite triplanar movements of the cervical spine thus allowing comparative analysis of the three-dimensional construct stability of the studied orthoses.