Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been shown to be a cost-effective means of treating hip arthritis, there is some ambiguity within the literature as to its success in those over 80 years of age. With the rapid expansion of this population group and an estimated 40% rise in THA figures expected by 2026, this study aims to review the results of primary THA in the octogenarian population. A series of 510 consecutive cases was obtained from the local arthroplasty database, consisting of all patients aged 80 years and over who underwent primary THA between 1994 and 2004. A control group of 3404 individuals under 80 years was also established using the same database and inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up for the octogenarian group was 5.9 years. Pain scores were comparable five years post-operatively in both groups (P=0.479); in particular 81.5% of octogenarians and 80.2% of the control noted no pain. Pre-operatively, the mean Harris Hip Function and Harris Hip Score were significantly lower in the octogenarian group by 4.3 and 4.2 points (P< 0.001), respectively, and at five years follow-up were also lower by 8.4 and 8.0 points, respectively (P< 0.001). Median hospital stay was three days longer in the elderly population (12 cf 9, P< 0.001). More complications occurred in the octogenarian group (38.1% cf 28.7% of controls, P< 0.001) however fewer cases of revision were noted (1.4% cf 3.8%, P=0.005). Kaplan-Meier analysis found implant survival time to revision to be comparable in both groups (mean 16.4 years in control cf 14.3 years in octogenarian, P=0.17). Patient satisfaction was also similar (97.8% in octogenarians and 98.1% in controls, P=0.741). This study suggests that individuals over 80 years of age have comparable pain improvement and overall satisfaction, low revision rates, reduced functional improvement and are more prone to complications compared to younger patients.

Post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection is necessary if accurate rates of infection following surgery are to be available. We undertook a prospective study of 376 knee and hip replacements in 366 patients in order to estimate the rate of orthopaedic surgical site infection in the community. The inpatient infection was 3.1% and the post-discharge infection rate was 2.1%. We concluded that the use of telephone interviews of patients to identify the group at highest risk of having a surgical site infection (those who think they have an infection) with rapid follow-up by a professional trained to diagnose infection according to agreed criteria is an effective method of identifying infection after discharge from hospital.