This prospective, randomized, controlled trial compares patient outcome after non-operative care versus open reduction and tunneled suspension device fixation (ORTSD) for grade III or IV acromioclavicular joint disruptions. Sixty patients aged between sixteen and thirty-five years with an acute grade III or IV AC joint disruption were randomized to receive ORTSD fixation or non-operative treatment. Functional assessment was conducted at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hands (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and Short Form (SF-12). Reduction was evaluated using radiographs. Complications were recorded, and an economic evaluation performed. There was no significant difference in DASH or OSS at one year between non-operative and ORTSD groups (DASH score, 4.67 versus 5.63; OSS, 45.72 versus 45.63). Patients undergoing surgery had inferior DASH scores at 6 weeks (p<0.01). Five patients who failed non-operative management subsequently received surgery. Overall cost of treatment was significantly greater after ORTSD fixation (£796.22 vs £3359.73 (p<0.01)). ORTSD fixation confers no functional benefit over non-operative treatment at one year. While patients managed non-operatively generally recover faster, a significant group remain dissatisfied following non-operative treatment requiring delayed surgical reconstruction.
1. Three cases of ganglion of the lateral popliteal nerve are reported, all of which were treated by resection of the nerve. 2. In none was a connection between the ganglion and the superior tibio-fibular joint seen. 3. A careful histological study suggests that the condition is one of simple ganglion arising in the supporting tissues of the nerve. 4. A search of the literature has revealed twelve reported cases. The clinical and operative findings, together with the results of treatment, have been reviewed. 5. The treatment of choice is dissection of the ganglion from the nerve. If this proves difficult because of the multiplicity of cysts, incision and evacuation of cyst contents should be performed, although recurrence is possible after this procedure. 6. The prognosis for recovery of function is good when paralysis has been present for less than one year. Recovery of motor function is unlikely to be complete if there has been a longer duration of paralysis, though sensory recovery is usually good.
1. A case of giant-cell tumour of the proximal end of the humerus treated by resection and fibular grafting twenty-nine years ago is reported. An excellent functional result has been maintained. 2. The literature is reviewed and the results claimed by earlier workers are noted. 3. The present field of application of the operation is probably in cases of advanced or recurrent giant-cell tumour of bone.
