The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and oncological outcome of recycled autograft reconstruction after a wide excision for primary malignant bone tumor around the hip.

From 1998 to 2015, 67 patients with a primary malignant bone tumor involving proximal femur or periacetabular zone (P2) were included. There were 36 males and 31 females with a mean age of 34 years (13 to 58). Of these, 29 patients had grade I or II chondrosarcoma, 28 high-grade osteosarcoma, 6 Ewing's sarcoma and 4 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Enneking stage of all 67 patients was stage II. Of the resection classification, proximal femur resection was performed in 29 patients, P1+P2 in 15, P2+P3 in 14, P1+P2+P3 in 4, P2 only in 4, and P2+proximal femur in 1. Extracorporeally irradiated recycled autograft and liquid nitrogen frozen autograft were performed in 44 and 23 patients, respectively.

At a mean follow-up of 98 months (10 to 239), 48 patients (72%) were continuously disease-free, 12 (18%) died of disease and 7 (10%) were alive with disease. The tumors of these patients who had died of disease were usually located in pelvic bones (10/12). Of these 37 patients with pelvic tumors, 7 patients (22%) had local recurrence, four of them received external hemipelvectomy. Other complications included hip dislocation in 2 patients, nerve injury in 2 and deep infection in 2. However, the above complications were rarely occurred in the patients with proximal femur reconstruction. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score were 77% (53 to 93).

Recycled autograft reconstruction for primary malignant bone tumor around the hip is a valid method with acceptable morbidity and a favorable functional outcome.

Two-stage reconstruction with total implant removal and re-implantation after infection control is considered the gold standard treatment forinfection after hip arthroplasty. However, removal of the well-fixed stem or cup may cause substantial bone loss and other complications, thereby making reconstruction difficult. We evaluated whether an infection posttotal hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of the radiographically and clinically well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular cup. Patients with a chronic infection aftertotal hip arthroplasty, with a radiographically well-fixed, cementless stem or cup, were selected. During the first surgical stage, we retained the stem or cup if we were unable to removethese with a stem or cup extractor. An antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was then implanted. After control of infection (C-reactive proteinlevel within normal value), we performed the secondstage of re-implantation surgery. Treatment failure was defined as uncontrolled infection requiringremoval of the retained implant.

From January 2004 to December 2013, 16 patients underwent partial component-retained 2-stage reconstruction. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were free of infection, with a mean follow-up time of 5 years. The remaining 3 patients, who had high-risk comorbidities and, of whom, 2 were infected by high-virulence organism, had uncontrolled infection and required furthersurgery to remove the retained implant.

We conclude that partial component-retained 2-stage reconstruction could be an alternative treatment option for chronic infection afteran uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a radiographically and clinically well-fixed component in selected patients, who are notimmunocompromised and are infected by a low-virulence organism.