A key outcome measured by national joint registries are revision events. This informs best practice and identifies poor-performing surgical devices. Although registry data often record reasons for revision arthroplasty, interpretation is limited by lack of standardised definitions of revision reasons and objective assessment of radiologic and laboratory parameters. Our study aim was to compare reasons for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision reported to the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) with reasons identified by independent clinical review. A total of 2,272 patients undergoing primary medial and lateral UKA at four large tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2017 were included. A total of 158 patients underwent subsequent revision with mean follow-up of 8 years. A systematic review of clinical findings, radiographs and operative data was performed to identify revision cases and to determine the reasons for revision using a standardised protocol. These were compared to reasons reported to the NZJR using Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests.Introduction
Methods
Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation have been associated with worse health outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has not previously been investigated. A total of 217 patients (171 female, 46 male; median age 23.4 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep) Index: minimal deprivation (NZDep Index 1–3, n=89), moderate deprivation (NZDep Index 4-6, n=94), and maximal deprivation (NZDep Index 7-10, n=34). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables, surgical details, complications, and pre-operative and two-year post-operative functional scores (including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), EQ-5D quality of life score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for the effect of NZDep Index on patient outcomes. Patients in the maximal deprivation group were more likely to be Māori (p<0.001) and have surgery in a public rather than a private hospital (p=0.004), while the minimal deprivation group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.005). There were otherwise no other significant differences in baseline variables, surgical details, complications, nor pre-operative or two-year post-operative functional scores between the three groups (all p>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a higher NZDep Index to be independently predictive of a lower pre-operative UCLA activity score (p=0.014) and a higher two-year iHOT-12 score (p<0.001). Our results demonstrate an inequality in access to PAO, with patients exposed to higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation under-represented in our study population. When provided access to PAO, these vulnerable patients achieve significant functional improvement at least as great as patients with less socioeconomic deprivation. Initiatives to improve access to hip preservation care in socioeconomically deprived populations appear warranted.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and particle-induced osteolysis are closely related to peri-implant local immunity and macrophage function. We previously demonstrated that titanium particles attenuate the immune response of macrophages caused by chronic inflammation [1]. In a separate study, we have determined that UHMWPE wear particles containing vitamin E (VE) induce less osteolysis compared to HXL UHMWPE wear particles in a murine calvarium model [2]. For this study we hypothesized that macrophages exposed to HXL UHMWPE particles containing VE would better maintain their ability to respond to A gamma-sterilized, HXL UHMWPE tibial bearing containing VE (E1, Biomet, “VE-PE”) and 100kGy irradiated and melted UHMWPE (“CISM 100”) were cryomilled to particles by Bioengineering Solutions (Oak Park, IL). In the first Introduction
Methods
To investigate the biomechanical mechanism and report preliminary clinical efficacy of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy (ERAO) when conduct treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Biomechanical model of the hip joint was established on six female cadaveric hips embalmed by formalin and stimulate ERAO was then performed on the model. Vertical force was loaded on the cadaveric spine from 0 N to 500 N and strain value on femoral head was measured preoperatively and postoperatively when loading force on spine reached the point of 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 N. Stress value were then calculated base on the measurements. Besides, we reported postoperative follow up cases which were underwent ERAO to treat DDH in our hospital from July 2007 to October 2014. A total of 25 patients (26 hips) were reported, including 6 males and 19 females. Age varies from 11 to 57 years old, and the average age was 31 years old. Postoperative hip function was evaluated by Harris hip score and anteroposterior X⁃ray of pelvic was taken preoperatively and postoperatively to measure the Acetabular⁃head index (AHI), CE angle and Sharp angle.Objective
Methods
To investigate the biomechanical basis and report preliminary clinical efficacy of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy (ERAO) when treating developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Biomechanical model of the hip joint was established on cadaveric hips. After performed ERAO on the biomechanical model, we explored the impact of this surgery on biomechanics of the hip joint. Meanwhile, we reported postoperative follow-up cases who underwent ERAO in our hospital between November 2007 to July 2012. A total of 14 patients (15 hips) were reported, including 4 males and 10 females, mean age was 30 years old. Harris hip score was defined as clinical evaluation standard and radiographic assessment was based on the measurement and further comparison of pre- and post-operative AHI (Acetabular-head index), CE angle (Center-edge angle) and Sharp angle.Objective
Methods
