Introduction

Knee arthroplasty is an effective intervention for painful arthritis when conservative measures have failed. Despite recent advances in component design and implantation techniques, a significant proportion of patients experience problems relating to the patella-femoral joint (PFJ).

Detailed knowledge of the shape and orientation of the normal and replaced femoral trochlea groove is critical when considering potential causes of anterior knee pain. Furthermore, to date it has proved difficult to establish a diagnosis due to shortcomings in current imaging techniques for obtaining satisfactory coronal plane motion data of the patella in the replaced knee.

The aim of this study was to correlate the trochlea shape of normal and replaced knees with corresponding coronal plane PFJ kinematic data.

Previous attempts to measure coronal plane patellofemoral kinematics following knee replacement have suffered from methodological drawbacks; the patella being obscured by the components, metal artefact and technical inaccuracies. The aim of this study was to assess whether there was any significant difference in the patellofemoral kinematics between normal, TKR and PFJR patients using the validated MAUS™ technique (combining motion analysis with ultrasound).

60 patients were recruited into three groups; normal healthy volunteers (Normal), TKR, and PFJR patients. The MAUS technique incorporates a 12 camera analysis system (providing gross alignment data for tibial and femoral segments) and an ultrasound probe (providing coordinates of bony landmarks on patella femur and tibia) during a squat exercise. 6 DOF kinematics were described between 0 and 90° flexion. The validated accuracy of the MAUS technique registering the ultrasound images within the motion capture system is 1.84 mm (2 × SD).

Movements of the Normal group were significantly different from the TKR group (p=0.03) and the PFJR group (p<0.01), whilst there was no significant difference between the TKR and PFJR groups (p=0.27).

Our data suggest that many aspects of patellofemoral kinematics are absent following TKR and PFJR, which could be addressed in future designs of knee TKR and PFJR.

A femoral head/neck ratio (HNR) of less than 1.27 is associated with an increased risk of arthritis. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is evolutionary evidence that the homonin, bipedal stance has led to alterations in HNR that predispose humans to osteoarthritis (OA).

Specimens provided by The Natural History Museums of London, Oxford and the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford were grouped according to gait pattern, HAKF (Hip and knee flexed), Arboreal (ability to stand with hip and knee joints extended) and homonin/bi-pedal. Specimens included those from Devonion, Triassic, Jurrasic, Cretaceous, Miocene, Paleolithic, Pleistocene periods to modern day. Three-dimensional skeletal geometries were segmented using CT images and HNR measurements were taken from coronal views. These were compared with the HNR of 119 asymptomatic human volunteers and 210 patients that had a hip joint replacement for primary OA.

Species of the HAKF group had the smallest HNR (1.10, SD:0.09). Species of the Arboreal group had significantly higher HNR (1.63, SD:0.15) in comparison to the Bipedal group (1.41, SD:0.04) (p=0.006), Human (1.33, SD:0.08) and the OA group (1.3, SD:0.09).

The range of movement associated with arboreal habitat caused an associated change in HNR. This study would suggest that the HNR peaked in the Miocene period with species that ambulated on both ground and trees. More recent homonin gait appears to have developed a smaller HNR and humans have the smallest amongst their close ancestors. Evolutionary theory would suggest that modern environmental pressures might pre-dispose future hominin evolution to OA, secondary to a further reduction in HNR.