There is sufficient evidence that specialised orthopaedic services, in the form of ‘hub’ or specialist centres, which undertake a high volume of workload in revision arthroplasty generate superior outcomes.

The East Midlands South Orthopaedic Network (EMSSON) was set up in 2015 and is an example of a ‘hub and spoke’ network. The network has recently undergone adaptation in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is paucity of data considering the impact of such adaptations in a post-pandemic era and on adherence to advice given.

Two data sets were obtained from the EMSSON data base, pertaining to pre and post pandemic eras respectively. Datasets were analysed and compared for case volumes, proportion of overall arthroplasty volume discussed and adherence to agreed management plans.

Dataset one included 107 cases, of these 99 cases were discussed (54 knees and 45 hips). This equates to 35% of total revision arthroplasty volume recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR), by units involved in the network. A change of plan was recommended in 45/99 cases (45%), of these 41 (93%) were adhered to. Dataset two included 99 cases, of these 98 were discussed (39 knees and 59 hips). This equates 68% of revision arthroplasty volume performed by the region according to NJR records. A change in plan was recommended in 20 cases (20.5%), all of which were adhered to. One case was referred to the ‘hub’ for surgery.

Following the implementation of recent adaptations, the efficiency of the EMSSON network has significantly improved. A greater volume and proportion of revision arthroplasty cases are now being discussed on a weekly basis. Management plans for which adaptations are suggested have decreased, indicating an educational value of such networking practices. Adherence to agreed plans also showed improvement (p<0.03).

These findings demonstrate a trend towards NHS England's target of 100% of revision arthroplasty cases undergoing MDT discussion. Changes made in light of the Covid-pandemic, are felt to have contributed significantly to the overall performance of regional networking and have been well received by consultants involved.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. There is still no consensus regarding the best mode of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety profile and rate of adverse thromboembolic events of aspirin as extended out of hospital pharmacological anticoagulation for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients and whether these rates were comparable with published data for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data was extracted from a prospective hospital acquired thromboembolism (HAT) database. The period of study was from 1st Jan 2013-31st Dec 2016 and a total of 6078 patients were treated with aspirin as extended thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 90 days postoperatively was 1.11%. The secondary outcome rates of wound infection, bleeding complications, readmission rate and mortality were comparable to published results after LMWH use. The results of this study clearly show that Aspirin, as part of a multimodal thromboprophylactic regime, is an effective and safe regime in preventing VTE with respect to risk of DVT or PE when compared to LMWH. It is a cheaper alternative to LMWH and has associated potential cost savings.

This study presents the intraoperative findings of a cohort of 201 cases of failed Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) from the Trent Wales arthroplasty audit group (TWAAG) register from 1990 to 2008. The main objectives of the study were to determine the common modes of failure and trends in implant systems used using sex and age matching criteria.

Results demonstrate the varying reasons for revision, use of augmentation and surgical preference in revision system. Results include survival rates and revision rates of UKA from the Trent Wales arthroplasty audit group. The average patient age at revision surgery with the average times from primary UKA to total knee arthroplasty are demonstrated. Aseptic loosening was the commonest reason for revision in both younger and older age groups, closely followed by Polyethylene wear in the younger age group versus progression of osteoarthritis in the other compartments in the older age group. The commonest implant used was Oxford unicompartmental knee system at primary surgery with the PFC implant used in almost 50% of all cases that were revised. This study demonstrates the survival rate of UKAs to be significantly higher in female patients and in those patients with primary UKAs at a younger age. The trends in revision systems have changed over the years. In the early years, over 50% used the PFC knee systems, compared to the latter eight years where the majority used revision knee systems, (e.g. LCCK and Legion). This trend is due to increased availability and ease of use of revision systems. The commonest site of augmentation was for tibial bone defects. Approximately 50% of all augmented cases required tibial blocks or wedges.

Although current thinking suggests most UKAs can be revised to a primary total knee system without difficulty, a significant proportion required revision implant systems with associated implications.

Introduction and Aims: The study was designed to compare the early results, prospectively, of the fixed-bearing Zimmer NexGen cruciate retaining (CR) and the Zimmer NexGen mobile-bearing knee (MBK) knee arthroplasty. The study was designed to determine whether differences exist in the clinical outcomes between patients receiving different types of bearings.

Method: Patients were randomly assigned to receiving either fixed or mobile bearings. Patients were blinded but not assessors to the type of arthroplasty. The study commenced in June 2000. By November 2002, 69 and 70 patients had been recruited into the CR and MBK groups respectively. Consultants were present in 92% of operations and the rest were performed by a senior registrar. The major indication was osteoarthritis (64 CR: 65 MBK). The surgical approach was medial parapatellar in 65 CR and 63 MBK the rest were subvastus, patella resurfacing was not routinely employed. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data was collated.

Results: The body mass index was 32 ± 7 CR and 32 ± 6 MBK. The average age was 67 ± 8 CR and 67 ± 8 MBK. Pain in the contralateral knee was present in 79.7% CR and 74.3% MBK group. Minimum post-operative follow-up was one year. There was no significant difference in the pre-operative and post-operative fixed flexion contracture, 4.3 ± 5.4 to 1.0 ± 2.9 CR and 6.2 ± 6.9 to 0.9 ± 2.8. The mean flexion pre-operatively and post-operatively between the two groups was not significantly different 108 ± 19 to 105 ± 16 CR and 107 ± 15 to 102 ± 13. Patello-femoral joint symptoms diminished from 67% to 12% CR and from 69% to 21% in the MBK group. The dependence on walking aids diminished from 50.7% to 16.7% CR and 51.4% to 26.9% MBK. At one year, nine percent and 21% were dissatisfied in the CR and MBK groups respectively. In the CR group, two revisions had been performed, one for infection and the other for arthrolysis and poly exchange. Two revisions had been carried out in the MBK group, one for extreme ‘clunking’ and the other for arthrolysis with poly exchange.

Conclusions: The one-year results suggest that the levels of dissatisfaction and patello-femoral problems are significantly greater in the mobile bearing group as opposed the fixed bearing. The early results would not encourage the use of the mobile bearings. We await the long-term results as regards survivorship of the bearings.

MRI is a well-tolerated, short procedure that would provide an early, accurate and cost effective diagnosis in elderly patients with negative plain films and persistent post-traumatic hip pain, thereby facilitating their correct management.

It is 100% sensitive and specific to occult hip fractures and does not involve ionising radiation.

Fractured necks of femur in the elderly population are common. This group of patients are responsible for a significant proportion of health care costs and efforts today. The diagnosis of hip fractures is not always clear-cut and plain radiographs may not show an undisplaced fracture. The management of this patient group is dependant upon the correct diagnosis via imaging and treatment decisions are based on these findings. If these fractures are missed, there is a significant chance of displacement and avascular necrosis presenting at a later date. This would complicate matters and result in more complex surgery. This also increases health care costs due to an extra admission, more expensive and difficult surgery with longer rehabilitation and after care. In our study, the management of the patients reviewed was significantly altered due to the imaging process used.

We performed MRI scans on thirty-six patients who had post-traumatic hip pain and negative plain radiographs (reported as normal or equivocal). Twenty-three (64%) of the patients sustained a fracture, of which sixteen (44%) involved the neck of the femur, all of whom were above the age of 71 years. 100% of the elderly age group scanned were positive for a femoral neck fracture and eleven (31%) received operative intervention. The five patients who did not undergo operative management were deemed too unwell for surgery. Only three patients’ scans were negative.

These results confirm that MRI (in the 71 years and above age group), is indicated in order to diagnose an undisplaced fractured neck of femur not recognised on plain radiographs, which requires operative intervention in the form of dynamic hip screw or cannulated hip screws to prevent further deterioration or displacement.