Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) allows to restore stability of the knee, in order to facilitate the return to activity (RTA). Although it is understood that the tendon autograft undergoes a ligamentous transformation postoperatively, knowledge about longitudinal microstructural differences in tissue integrity between types of tendon autografts (ie, hamstring vs. patella) remains limited.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has emerged as an objective biomarker to characterize the ligamentization process of the tendon autograft following surgical reconstruction. One major limitation to its use is the need for a pre-injury baseline MRI to compare recovery of the graft, and inform RTA. Here, we explore the relationship for DTI biomarkers (fractional anisotropy, FA) between knees bilaterally, in healthy participants, with the hypothesis that agreement within a patient's knees may support the use of the contralateral knee as a reference to monitor recovery of the tendon autograft, and inform RTA.

Fifteen participants with no previous history of knee injuries were enrolled in this study (age, 26.7 +/− 4.4 years; M/F, 7/8). All images were acquired on a 3T Prisma Siemens scanner using a secured flexible 18-channel coil wrapped around the knee. Both knees were scanned.

A 3D anatomical Double Echo Steady State (DESS) sequence was acquired on which regions of interest (ROI) were placed consistent with the footprints of the ACL (femur, posteromedial corner on medial aspect of lateral condyle; tibia, anteromedial to intercondylar eminence). Diffusion images were acquired using fat saturation based on optimized parameters in-house.

All diffusion images were pre-processed using the FMRIB FSL toolbox. The footprint ROIs of the ACL were then used to reconstruct the ligament in each patient with fiber-based probabilistic tractography (FBPT), providing a semi-automated approach for segmentation. Average FA was computed for each subject, in both knees, and then correlated against one another using a Pearson correlation to assess the degree of similarity between the ACLs.

A total of 30 datasets were collected for this study (1/knee/participant; N=15). The group averaged FA (+/− standard deviation) for the FBPT segmented ACLs were found to equal 0.1683 +/− 0.0235 (dominant leg) and 0.1666 +/− 0.0225 (non-dominant leg). When comparing both knees within subjects, reliable agreement was found for the FBPT-derived ACL with a linear correlation coefficient (rho) equal to 0.87 (P < 0 .001).

We sought to assess the degree of concordance in FA between the knees of healthy participants with hopes to provide a method for using the contralateral “healthy” knee in the comparison of autograft-dependent longitudinal changes in microstructural integrity, following ACL reconstruction. Our results suggest that good agreement in anisotropy can be achieved between the non-dominant and dominant knees using DTI and the FBPT segmentation method.

Contralateral anisotropy of the ACL, assuming no previous injuries, may be used as a quantitative reference biomarker for monitoring the recovery of the tendon autograft following surgical reconstruction, and gather further insight as to potential differences between chosen autografts. Clinically, this may also serve as an index to supplement decision-making with respect to RTA, and reduce rates of re-injuries.

The 2020-2021 Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) match year was altered on an unprecedented scale. Visiting electives were cancelled at a national level, and the CaRMS interview tour was moved to a virtual model. These changes posed a significant challenge to both prospective students and program directors (PDs), requiring each party to employ alternative strategies to distinguish themselves throughout the match process. For a variety of reasons, including a decline in applicant interest secondary to reduced job prospects, the field of orthopaedic surgery was identified as vulnerable to many of these changes, creating a window of opportunity to evaluate their impacts on students and recruiting residency programs.

This longitudinal survey study was disseminated to match-year medical students (3rd and 4th year) with an interest in orthopaedic surgery, as well as orthopaedic surgery program directors. Responses to the survey were collected using an electronic form designed in Qualtrics (Qualtrics, 2021, Provo, Utah, USA). Students were contacted through social media posts, as well as by snowball sampling methods through appropriate medical student leadership intermediates. The survey was disseminated to all 17 orthopedic surgery program directors in Canada.

A pre-match and post-match iteration of this survey were designed to identify whether expectations differed from reality regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the CaRMS match 2020-2021 process. A similar package was disseminated to Canadian orthopaedic surgery program directors pre-match, with an option to opt-in for a post-match survey follow-up. This survey had a focus on program directors’ opinions of various novel communication, recruitment, and assessment strategies, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Students’ responses to the loss of visiting electives were negative. Despite a reduction in financial stress associated with reduced need to travel (p=0.001), this was identified as a core component of the clerkship experience. In the case of virtual interviews, students’ initial trepidation pre-CaRMS turned into a positive outlook post-CaRMS (significant improvement, p=0.009) indicating an overall satisfaction with the virtual interview format, despite some concerns about a reduction in their capacity to network. Program directors and selection committee faculty also felt positively about the virtual interview format. Both students and program directors were overwhelmingly positive about virtual events put on by both school programs and student-led initiatives to complement the CaRMS tour.

CaRMS was initially developed to facilitate the matching process for both students and programs alike. We hope to continue this tradition of student-led and student-informed change by providing three evidence-based recommendations. First, visiting electives should not be discontinued in future iterations of CaRMS if at all possible. Second, virtual interviews should be considered as an alternative approach to the CaRMS interview tour moving forward. And third, ongoing virtual events should be associated with a centralized platform from which programs can easily communicate virtual sessions to their target audience.