Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 115 - 115
1 Jan 2017
Ezzat A Chakravarty D Cairns D Craig N
Full Access

Newer irreversible oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban, a direct factor 10a inhibitor, are increasingly employed to prevent thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, and to manage venous thromboembolism (VTE). Unlike warfarin, these agents require no monitoring and involve infrequent dose adjustment. We report the case of a patient treated with rivaroxaban for AF. Patient presented with unprovoked sudden onset right shoulder pain which clinically resembled shoulder haemarthrosis.

A single case was anonymised and retrospectively reviewed through examination of clinical and radiographic data.

A 70 year old female with known AF presented to Accident and Emergency with sudden onset of right shoulder pain and limited movement, which developed over one hour. The pain was constant, localised to the shoulder and without trauma. Past medical history included severe aortic regurgitation and associated thoracic aortic aneurysm, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Observations were normal upon admission with no haemodynamic compromise or pyrexia. Examining the right shoulder demonstrated distension of shoulder joint capsule, tenderness and a reduced range of movement. Temperature and neurovascular status in the right arm were normal. Investigations upon admission included an INR of 1.2. An anteroposterior right shoulder radiograph showed no evidence of fracture. Patient was managed conservatively with simple oral analgesia. Importantly, rivaroxaban was withheld for 5 days and symptoms resolved. Warfarin therapy was subsequently commenced instead as treatment for AF. Patient was discharged one week later and seen in clinic two weeks post-discharge. A full recovery occurred and with a full range of movement in the right shoulder.

In the UK, current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of factor 10a inhibitors, for prevention of stroke in AF patients, and following elective total hip and knee replacement operations to prevent VTE. In turn, rivaroxaban is increasingly prescribed as first line therapy. Whereas warfarin has a documented association with haemarthrosis, there is no primary literature evaluating the incidence of factor 10a therapy associated haemarthrosis. In our case, the unprovoked shoulder haemarthrosis resolved following rivaroxaban cessation. In comparison with warfarin, rivaroxaban is irreversible. With warfarin and a high INR, vitamin K can be used to reverse the anticoagulation. There is no equivalent for rivaroxaban. We suggest further studies into incidence of haemarthrosis associated with oral anticoagulant therapy be undertaken, and treating physicians be aware of such complication.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 25 - 25
1 Mar 2008
Chakravarty D Parker M Boyle A
Full Access

This study was conducted to find out whether blood transfusion was an independent risk factor for mortality and wound infections after hip fracture surgery.

A retrospective cohort study analysed prospectively collected data for 3571 hip fracture patients undergoing surgery over the last 15 years in one institution. Out of these 1068 patients underwent blood transfusion.

There were no significant differences in the mortality values at 30, 120 and 365 days and in the rates of infection (superficial and deep) in the two groups (transfused and non-transfused).

Conclusion: Blood transfusion does not significantly increase mortality or infection following hip fracture surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 43 - 44
1 Mar 2006
Chakravarty D Parker M Boyle A
Full Access

Introduction: This study was conducted to find out whether blood transfusion was an independent risk factor for mortality and wound infection after hip fracture surgery.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study analysed prospectively collected data for 3571 hip fracture patients undergoing surgery over the last 15 years in one institution. Out of these 1068 patients underwent blood transfusion.

Results: There were no significant differences in the mortality values at 30, 120 and 365 days and in the rates of infection (superficial and deep) in the two groups(transfused and non-transfused).

Conclusion: Blood transfusion does not significantly increase mortality or infection following hip fracture surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 311 - 311
1 Sep 2005
Chakravarty D Boyle A Parker M
Full Access

Introduction and Aims: Immune suppression induced by blood transfusion may be a determinant in the development of post-operative infectious complications. This study was to determine if blood transfusion was an independent risk factor for mortality and wound infections after hip fracture surgery.

Method: A retrospective cohort study analysing the prospectively collected data for 3571 hip fracture patients undergoing surgery over the last 15 years at one institution. Out of these 1068 patients underwent blood transfusion. Mortality was related to whether the patient was transfused, and adjusted for confounding predictors of mortality (age, sex, pre-operative haemoglobin concentration residential status, ASA grade and mobility).

Results: 3461 cases remained after 290 (7.7%) cases had to be excluded for missing data in the multivariate analysis. The mortality values at 30,120 and 365 days in the transfused group were 95 (8.9%), 247 (23.1%) and 381 (35.7%), whereas corresponding values in the non-transfused group were 181 (7.2%), 374 (14.9%) and 626 (25.0%). This difference at six and 12 months was statistically significant. With adjustment for confounding variables with a Cox regression mode the hazard ratio for mortality at one year was 1.11 (95% CI 0.96–1.29, p value 0.17). Superficial infection occurred in 22 patients (2.0%) in the transfused group and there were 10 deep infections (0.9%). This was not a statistically significant difference from the incidence in the non-transfused group, 48 cases (1.9%) and 15 (0.6%) respectively.

Conclusion: In conclusion, although it appears that blood transfusions are associated with an increased mortality, when this is adjusted for baseline characteristics and confounding variables, the difference is not statistically significant. Neither was there an increased incidence of wound infection in the transfused patients.