Safe and meticulous removal of the femoral cement mantle and cement restrictor can be a challenging process in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Many proximal femoral osteotomies have been described to access this region however they can be associated with fracture, non-union and revision stem instability. The aim of this study is to report outcomes of our previously unreported vascularised anterior window to the proximal femur.

We report on a cohort of patients who underwent cemented single and staged rTHA at our single institution by the same surgeon between 2012 and 2017 using a novel vascularised anterior window of the femur to extract the cement mantle and restrictor safely under direct vision. We describe our technique, which maintains the periosteal and muscular attachments to the osteotomised fragment, which is then repaired with a polymer cerclage cable. In all revisions a polished, taper slip, long stem Exeter was cemented. Primary outcome measures included the time taken for union and the patient reported WOMAC score.

Thirty-two rTHAs were performed in 29 consecutive patients (13 female, 16 male) with a mean age of 63.4 years (range, 47–88). The indications for revision included infection, aseptic loosening and implant malpositioning. Mean follow up was 5.3 (range, 3.2–8 years). All femoral windows achieved radiographic union by a mean of 7.2 weeks. At the latest point in follow-up the mean WOMAC score was 21.6 and femoral component survivorship was 100%. There were no intraoperative complications or additional revision surgery.

Our proposed vascularised anterior windowing technique of the femur is a safe and reproducible method to remove the distal femoral cement and restrictor under direct vision without the need for perilous instruments. This method also preserves the proximal bone stock and provides the surgeon with the option of cemented stems over uncemented revision implants that predominantly rely on distal fixation.

Background

Patients suffering a distal femoral fracture are at a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Currently this cohort is not afforded the same resources as those with hip fractures. This study aims to compare their mortality rates and assess whether surgical intervention improves either outcome or mortality following distal femoral fractures.

Narrowing of the femoral neck after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip has been described previously in both cemented and uncemented hip resurfacing. Traditionally hip resurfacing has been performed via a posterior approach though other surgical approaches including the Ganz and the anterolateral approach have been well described. In addition it is known that the blood supply of the femoral neck arises largely from posterior structures and it has been postulated that neck narrowing is a consequence of poor post-operative femoral neck vascularity. Our null hypothesis in this study was that the choice of surgical approach does not influence postoperative femoral neck narrowing. We retrospectively measured the diameter of the femoral neck in a series of 135 consecutive patients who underwent uncemented cormet hip resurfacing, with follow up from one to 3 years. Our sample included 50 females and 85 men with an average age of 56.4 years (standard deviation of 9.47). Seventy six patients had a Ganz approach, 5 had an anterolateral approach and 55 had a posterior approach. There were no failures due to femoral neck fracture and no revisions to total hip arthroplasty. Eleven patients required subsequent surgery all of which were due to complications following trochanteric osteotomy. Seven patients needed removal of metalwork and 4 patients had non-union of their osteotomy requiring revision. At one year the posterior approach group had an average of 5.2% neck narrowing versus 2.7% neck narrowing in the Ganz approach group (p value 0.06). At three years the average neck narrowing amongst all patients was 6.8% (standard deviation 3.1%) but the number of patients who had had a Ganz approach was too small to meaningfully apply inference statistics. Our study shows early results which show a statistically significant reduction in the rate of femoral neck narrowing in patients who have had a Ganz approach as compared to a posterior approach for unce-mented hip resurfacing arthroplasty. It also shows a high rate of complications inherent with the Ganz approach which in our patient group are entirely related to the trochanteric osteotomy.