Alcohol-based cutaneous disinfectant use is well established in the surgical environment. However, during scrubbing, volatile alcohols are inspired into the pulmonary system. With the recent reduction in the national drink driving limit, even low levels of detected breath alcohol can have legal implications. This study aimed to determine the extent to which passive inhalation of alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectant affects estimated percentage blood alcohol concentration (%BAC) on breathalyser testing. Over a one week period (September 2015), 24 theatre team members (13 surgeons, 6 scrub staff and 5 anaesthetists) were prospectively recruited. The mean cohort age was 43.7 years (50% female). Participants were instructed to scrub for 90 seconds with an alcohol-based hand disinfectant comprising of the active ingredients (per 100g): propan-1-ol 30.0g, propan-2-ol 45.0g and mecetroniumetilsulphate 0.2g. Estimated %BAC was recorded immediately before and after scrubbing, and every five minutes thereafter until levels returned to 0.00%BAC. Results ≥ 0.05%BAC were deemed above the Scottish legal driving limit. All participants exceeded the 0.05%BAC threshold on immediate post scrub testing. The mean peak %BAC was 0.12% (± 0.05) with a maximum BAC documented at ≥0.20% in four subjects. In all participants, the %BAC descended to zero over a period ranging from 10–30 minutes with a mean time to zero of 16.7 (± 4.8) minutes. Following the use of alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectant, estimated blood alcohol concentrations detected on breath sampling can rise up to four times the Scottish driving limit which may have legal and professional ramifications.
We report the results of a prospective study of 1349 patients undergoing 1509 total knee replacements, identifying factors increasing the risk of infection. Data were collected prospectively between October 1998 and February 2002 by a dedicated audit nurse. Pre-operative demographic and medical details were recorded. Operative and post-operative complications were noted. The definitions of surgical-site infection were based on a modification of those published by the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) in 1992. A superficial wound infection had a purulent discharge or positive culture of organisms from aseptically-aspirated fluid, tissue, or from a swab. Deep infection was counted as an infection that required a secondary procedure. Patients were seen at 6, 18 and 36 months post-operatively in a dedicated knee audit clinic and infection details recorded. The association between infection and other factors was tested by chi-squared or Mann-Whitney tests for categorised or quantitative factors respectively.Introduction
Methods
Patients were followed up at an average of 3.1 years (range 3.2 months to 5.1 years). Three patients had died at the time of our follow up due to unrelated medical problems. One patient had deep infection that required revision and 1 had superficial infection that healed with antibiotics. 1 patient underwent revision to a THR for hip pain. Of those managed with a single plate, 3 patients had plate/cable failure and underwent revision DM plating with 2 plates and cables along with allogenic bone grafting; all of these healed well. All of these patients had periprosthetic # following a THR. Five patients managed initially with 2 DM plates healed without any complications.
Range of movement was correlated with extent of soft tissue release, to see if release had any impact on increase in range of movement.
Patients requiring extensive releases tended to have less preoperative ROM, but the gain was independent of medial release. Those requiring extensive posterior release had poorer preoperative movement, and significantly less improvement. In those requiring an extensive medial release, a posterior release improved gain in ROM.
Range of movement (ROM) was correlated with extent of soft tissue release, to see if release had any impact on increase in range of movement.
In those requiring an extensive medial release, a posterior release improved gain in ROM.
Our aim was to assess femoral offset and leg length following hip resurfacing and hybrid THR (uncemented acetabulum) performed by the same surgeon.
All films were analysed by the same investigator using the technique described by Jolles et al (J Arthroplasty 2002). A horizontal line was drawn between the base of the teardrop on both sides, and perpendicular lines drawn from the back of the teardrops. The anatomical femoral axis was drawn and femoral offset measured from this. The centre of rotation of the femoral head was determined by templating and the acetabular offset obtained. Distance from tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head in the axis of the femur was determined on pre and post-op films, as this shows little variation with rotation of the femur. Leg length was measured from the horizontal line to the tip of the greater trochanter together with the angle between the femoral axis and the horizontal to correct for abduction of the hip.
Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip is being performed more frequently in the United Kingdom. The majority of these patients are younger than 55 years of age, and in this group the key benefits include conservation of femoral bone stock and the potential reduction in the rate of dislocation afforded by the larger resurfacing head. Early aseptic loosening is well recognised in patients younger than 55 years of age, and proponents of resurfacing believe that the improved wear characteristics of the metal-on-metal bearing may improve the long-term survival of this implant. There has been some concern, however, that resurfacing may not be conservative of acetabular bone. We compared a series of 33 consecutive patients who had a hybrid total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented acetabular component and a cemented femoral implant, with 35 patients undergoing a Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. We compared the diameter of the implanted acetabulum in both groups and, because they were not directly comparable, we corrected for patient size by measuring the diameter of the contralateral femoral head. The data were analysed using unpaired There was a significantly larger acetabulum in the Birmingham arthroplasty group (mean diameter 56.6 mm
Hip resurfacing is being performed more frequently in the United Kingdom. The possible benefits include more accurate restoration of leg length, femoral offset and femoral anteversion than occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared anteroposterior radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone hybrid THA (uncemented cup/cemented stem), with 28 who had undergone Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty (BHR). We measured the femoral offset, femoral length, acetabular offset and acetabular height with reference to the normal contralateral hip. The data were analysed by paired There was a significant reduction in femoral offset (p = 0.0004) and increase in length (p = 0.001) in the BHR group. In the THA group, there was a significant reduction in acetabular offset (p = 0.0003), but femoral offset and overall hip length were restored accurately. We conclude that hip resurfacing does not restore hip mechanics as accurately as THA.