A stastical analysis of intra and inter-observer variability was tested using the linearly-weighted kappa statistic for each of the 240 pixel density graphs taken and for the summation total in the 48 radiographs.
On analysis of the summation scores we expected an agreement of 75.54% and observed an actual agreement of 96.30%. This showed a kappa statistic of 0.8545 and a standard error of 0.0849.
There is a known association between femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and osteoarthritis of the hip. What is not known is whether arthroscopic excision of an impingement lesion can significantly improve a patient’s symptoms. This study compares the one-year results of hip arthroscopy for cam-type FAI in two groups of patients. The study (osteoplasty) group comprised 24 patients (24 hips) with cam-type FAI who underwent arthroscopic debridement with excision of their impingement lesion. The control (no osteoplasty) group comprised 47 patients (47 hips) who underwent arthroscopic debridement without excision of their impingement lesion. In both groups, the presence of FAI was confirmed on pre-operative plain radiographs. The modified Harris hip score (MHHS) was used for evaluation pre-operatively and at one year’s follow-up. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. A tendency towards higher median post-operative MHHS scores was observed in the study than in the control group (83 vs. 77, p = 0.11). This was supported by a significantly higher portion of patients in the osteoplasty group with excellent/good results (83% vs. 60%, p = 0.043). It appears that even further symptomatic improvement may be obtained after hip arthroscopy for FAI by means of the femoral osteoplasty. When treating cam impingement arthroscopically, both central and peripheral compartments of the hip should always be accessed.
Problems with chondral toxicity caused by prolonged exposure to local anaesthetics have been increasingly recognised. However, day-case hip arthroscopic surgery is frequently carried out using an intraarticular depot of local anaesthetic as post-operative analgesia plus additional opiate or oral analgesia as required. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three different post-operative analgesic regimes at hip arthroscopy, in particular examining whether intraarticular local anaesthetics gave any benefit. We investigated 71 consecutive patients undergoing day-case hip arthroscopy and prospectively audited their post-operative analgesic requirements. Each patient was given one of three alternative post-operative analgesic regimes. Group A (n=29) received bupivicaine 0.25% 10ml intraarticular and 20ml peri-portal skin infiltration, group B (n=23) had bupivicaine 0.25% 20ml peri-portal skin infiltration only, and group C (n=19) had no infiltration. Outcome measures were visual analogue scores (VAS) at time-points T1 (immediate post-operatively), T2 (one hour post-operatively), T3 (two hours post-operatively), and T4 (four hours post-operatively). Total opiate consumption was also recorded. There was significantly less post-operative pain in group A, compared with group C at T1 (p=0.03) and T2 (p=0.004), and compared with group B at T3 (p=0.02) and T4 (p=0.03). There were no significant differences in VAS between groups B and C at any time-points. Group A used significantly less opiates post-operatively compared with group B (p=0.008) or C (p<
0.001) but there was no significant difference in opiate use between groups B and C. There are no previous studies relating to hip arthros-copy post-operative analgesic requirements. Intraarticular local anaesthetic significantly reduces post-operative pain, but at what cost to the chondral surface? Local skin infiltration of the arthroscopy portals does not significantly alter pain levels or opiate requirements. Avoidance of intararticular local anaesthetic raises opiate requirements. We require improved alternative analgesic regimes.