The aim of management of an adult distal humeral fracture is to restore mobility, stability and pain-free elbow function. Good results are usually achieved in the majority of fractures treated with ORIF, but the management of comminuted fractures in elderly, frail patients with osteoporotic bone remains controversial. The literature focuses on elbow replacement if stable internal fixation cannot be achieved, with “bag-of-bones” management now rarely discussed eg. key-note paper - 10 successful cases reported by Brown RF & Morgan RG in 1971 (JBJS 53-B(3):425-428). We present the experience in two units in which conservative management has been actively adopted in selected cases by consultants with a subspecialty interest in the elbow. All patients over the age of 60 with distal humeral fractures (2007 – 2009) who had been treated conservatively were reviewed clinically and radiologically. Duration of follow-up and outcome, including the Oxford and quick DASH scores, were recorded, with the fractures classified using the AO system. There were 25 patients, 19 female and 6 male. 19/25 patients have been successfully treated conservatively with a mean Range Of Movement: Extension/Flexion: 45/125, Pronation/Supination 74/70. Only 5 underwent subsequent total elbow replacement and one delayed ORIF. There is a significant complication rate following surgical treatment with ORIF or elbow replacement in elderly, frail patients, including infection, painful non-union and/or stiffness. We believe that there is a role for initial conservative treatment in selected patients with low, displaced, comminuted humeral fractures in osteoporotic bone. Initial early mobilisation as pain allows can give good functional results without the risks of operation. It does not preclude future surgery if conservative treatment fails, but this is not required in the majority of cases.
Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis is a common condition in the ageing population. In Spinal decompression surgery a balance needs to be struck between the need to decompress the neural elements in the spinal canal and the risk of worsening the segmental instability that often coexists in this condition. Traditionally decompression has been supplemented with rigid stabilization e.g. fusion, which is irreversible. Recently semi-rigid or ‘soft’ stabilization philosophies have evolved. The Wallis Device is a second generation interspinous distraction/stabilization implant designed to achieve ‘soft’ segmental stabilization. In addition to stabilising the decompressed segment, it also provides a ‘block’ to full segmental extension, helping to maintain spinal canal dimensions even in the erect position. We followed up and assessed outcomes in 50 patients (25 spinal decompression + Wallis implant and 25 spinal decompression alone). The two arms of the study were matched for gender, age and level of lumbar decompression. A single surgeon was involved in each case and carried out a standard procedure of fenestration and medial facetectomy. Outcomes were assessed during clinical follow-up as well as by telephone, and included the VAS, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the EQ5D Health Domain. Early results suggest decreased incidence of recurrent symptoms and global improvement in all parameters measured, in those subjects that underwent Spinal decompression with Wallis stabilisation.
