Prosthetic joint infections provide complex management, due to often-difficult diagnosis, need for multiple surgeries and increased technical and financial requirements. “2 in 1” single stage approaches have been advocated due to reduction in risks, costs and complications. This study aimed to investigate the results of single stage revision using metaphyseal sleeves for infected primary Total Knee Replacement (TKR).

Prospective data was collected on all patients presenting with an infected primary TKR over an 8-year period (2009–17). All revision procedures were undertaken in a single stage using metaphyseal sleeves.

26 patients were included, 2 of which had previously failed 2 stage revision and 3 failed DAIR procedures. Mean age was 72.5. Mean BMI was 33.4. Median ASA 2. Mean time to revision was 3.5 years range 3 months to 12 years. Six patients had actively discharging sinuses at the time of surgery. Only 4 of the 26 patients had no positive microbiological cultures from deep tissue samples or joint aspirates.

Only one patient has a recurrence of infection. This patient did not require further surgery and is treated on long term antibiotic suppression and is systemically well.

There were statistically significant improvements in both the pain and function component of AKSS scores. There was no significant improvement in flexion, however mean extension and total range of movement both showed statistically significant improvements.

Using Metaphyseal sleeves in single stage revision for infected TKR are safe and lead to an improvement in pain, function and have excellent efficacy for eradication of infection.

By the end of training, every registrar is expected to demonstrate proficiency in total knee replacement (TKR). It is unclear whether functional outcomes for knee arthroplasty performed by training grade doctors under supervision of a consultant have equivalent functional outcomes to those performed by consultants.

This study investigated the functional outcomes following TKR in patients operated on by a supervised orthopaedic trainee compared to a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Patients undergoing surgery by a consultant (n=491) or by a trainee under supervision (n=145) between 2003 and 2006 were included. There was a single implant, approach and postoperative rehabilitation regime. Patients were reviewed eighteen months, three years and five years postoperatively.

There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics between the groups. There was no difference in length of stay or transfusion or tourniquet time. Both consultant (p<0.001) and trainee (p<0.001) groups showed significant improvement in AKSK and AKSF scores between preoperative and 18 month review and there was no difference in the magnitude of observed improvement between groups (AKSK p=0.853; AKSF p=0.970). There were no significant differences in either score between the groups preoperatively or at any review point postoperatively. At five years postoperative, both groups had a median OKS of 34 (p=0.921).

This is the largest reported series of outcomes following primary TKR examining functional outcome linked with grade of surgeon. It shows that a supervised trainee will achieve comparable functional outcomes at up to 5 years post operatively.