We have a national UK database for hip fracture outcome. It has been developed synchronously with an agreed care pathway that is multi-disciplinary, including surgeons, anaesthetists, geriatricians, osteoporosis experts, healthcare managers and lay charities. Care has been improved and audit established for future evolution. The database started in 2007 and now includes 85 units. The synchronous care pathway deals with falls and osteoporosis prevention, perioperative multi-disciplinary care, rehabilitation and outcome results. Key issues are avoidance of delay and cancellation of surgery and how we deal with patients with medical co-morbidities. Outcome is analysed prospectively to take account of co-morbidities and variations in surgical techniques. The care pathway and data base are now universally accepted as a national priority with advice for all UK trauma units to participate. Of the 121 registered units, only 85 actively contribute data. The cost and staff needs for data input are now accepted. To date, 12,983 clinical cases have been entered. Variation of trauma theatre list operating time per head of population and other related resource has been highlighted. This has been accepted by politicians and health managers. The NHS Institute of Improvement has started a rapid improvement plan to support units with poor resource/audit outcome. It is early days in terms of validity of outcome data for technical variations in treatment eg. fixation/replacement/use of bone cement. We have a national increase in resouce for hip fractures. We now have some logic to interaction between surgeons and medics/managers. Objectively struggling units get active support. We accept the possible lack of validity of some outcome data. Some units who look bad on paper should not be disadvantaged.
Vascularised soft tissue transfer may be helpful in the salvage of severe sepsis involving avascular tissues hosting joint replacements or other metal work. Transferred tissue covers the exposed implants and delivers intravenous antibiotics. Twenty-one cases for the knee, elbow and shoulder are presented. Gastrocnemius flaps were used for seven knee replacements and 10 knee fractures. Antegrade radial artery flaps were used for two elbow replacements. Pectoralis major or minor flaps were used for two shoulder replacements. All procedures were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon with supplementary plastics training. Synchronous bony surgery included revision arthroplasty in seven cases, conversion to fusion in one case and preservation of existing hardware in the remainder. Sepsis was eliminated in the longterm in 9 of 10 knee fracture fixation cases, 5 out of 7 knee replacements and both elbow replacements. Both shoulder replacements remained septic despite multiple repeat procedures. Complications included necrosis of two gastrocnemius flaps, one from pre-existing partial compartment syndrome and one when combined with fusion of the knee. One other knee replacement developed further sepsis three years post procedure. No limb required amputation. These procedures are well within the remit of orthopaedic surgeons, the non reliance on plastics surgeons allowed prompt treatment combined with bony procedures. Results were good for the knee and elbow but disappointing for the shoulder—this, probably related to the natural mobility of the joint.
