Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters.

Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups.

Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001).

Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature.

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters.

Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups.

Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001).

Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature.

The effect of early surgery on hip fracture outcomes has received considerable study and although it has been suggested that early surgical treatment of these fractures leads to better patient outcomes, the findings are inconclusive. The American College of Surgeon's (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) prospectively collects blinded, risk-adjusted patient-level data on surgical patients in over 600 participating hospitals worldwide. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of ACS-NSQIP hospital patients that are currently being treated within the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) time to hip fracture surgery benchmark. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for missing the benchmark, and determine if the benchmark is associated with improved 30-day patient outcomes.

Patients that underwent hip fracture surgery between 2005–2013 and entered in the ACS-NSQIP database were included in the study. Counts and proportions were used to determine how frequently the NICE benchmark was met. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of missing the NICE benchmark and determine if missing the benchmark was associated with 30-day mortality/complications rates.

26,006 patients met the study enrolment criteria. 71.4% of patients were treated within the NICE benchmark and 89.4% were treated by post-admission day two. Gender, dyspnea, infectious illness, bleeding disorders, preoperative hematocrit, preoperative platelet count, arthroplasty procedure type, race other than White, and hip fracture diagnosis were all statistically significant predictors of missing the benchmark (p<0.01). Meeting the NICE benchmark was not associated with reductions in major complications (OR=0.93, CI=0.83–1.05, p=0.23), nor a clinically significant difference in postoperative length of stay (LOS) (parameter estimate=0.77, p<0.01); however, it was associated with a decreased 30-day mortality (OR=0.88, CI=0.78–0.99, p=0.03) and the likelihood of minor complications (OR=0.92, CI=0.84–0.995, p=0.04).

ACS-NSQIP hospitals are currently compatible with the NICE benchmark. However, data from the ACS-NSQIP database suggests that surgical treatment within the NICE benchmark may be unnecessarily narrow. Extending the benchmark to post-operative day two did not significantly increase the risk of 30-day mortality and minor complications; nor did it extend the average LOS. Neither the NICE benchmark, nor the extended two-day standard, was associated with reductions in major complications. The findings highlight the importance of further prospective investigation to monitor the effect of time to surgery benchmarks.