Health literacy, the ability to seek, understand and utilise health information, is important for health and health-related decisions. Suboptimal health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes in many chronic conditions although this has not been studied in chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study explored health literacy in a community cohort with and without CLBP. 117 adults, comprising 61 with no history of CLBP and 56 with CLBP (28 with low and high disability, respectively, determined by a median split in Oswestry scores) participated. Using a mixed methods approach, data were collected on pain severity, LBP-related disability, fear avoidance, LBP beliefs, pain catastrophizing and health literacy was measured using the Short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). In-depth interviews were undertaken with 36 CLBP participants to explore beliefs about LBP and experiences in seeking, understanding and using LBP information. LBP-related beliefs and behaviours, rather than pain intensity and health literacy skills, were associated with disability related to LBP. Individuals with CLBP-high disability had poorer back pain beliefs and increased fear avoidance behaviours relating to physical activity. Although S-TOFHLA scores suggested adequate health literacy across all participants and these were not related to LBP beliefs and attitudes, interviews revealed that individuals with CLBP-high disability adopted a more passive coping style and had a patho-anatomical view of their disorder compared to individuals with CLBP-low disability.Purpose
Methods and results
A retrospective cohort – data from all emergency dispatches from a UK county ambulance service was linked to the Patient Admission System at local hospitals. All emergency dispatches for immediately life-threatening events (designated as Code Red) between 01/01/1995 and 31/06/2006 were tracked to death or discharge. Main Outcome Measures:
Mortality (at scene, at emergency department, and during hospitalisation), admissions (to the emergency department (ED), inpatients care, and the intensive care unit (ICU)) and mean lengths of stay were analysed by initial exposure (MP versus landline) using multi-variant analysis with logistic regression controlling for potential confounding variables. 354,199 ambulances were dispatched in the 11.5 years. Mobile phone use rose to 25% by study end. 66% of ambulances subsequently transferred patients to hospital. MP compared to landline reporting of emergencies resulted in significant reductions in the risk of death at scene for medical events (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.85), but not for trauma (OR 1.04). ED medical deaths were higher (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.33 to 1.72) as were in-patient (OR 1.19). There was no effect on ED or hospital trauma deaths (ORs 0.81, 0.84). The probability of being admitted to hospital and ICU was higher with MP call for trauma (ORs 1.22, 1.44). There was no difference in mortality between mobile or landline calls from either urban or rural areas. There is little evidence to suggest a lower threshold to make an emergency call from a MP. The potential advantages of MP use of ease of access, supplying bystander/patient advice and shortening the ‘golden hour’ appear confined to non-trauma emergencies.
