There is a significant positive association between hours of brace wear and rate of success in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The abandon rate reported in the literature averages 18%. In a recent randomized trial conducted at our center; the abandon rate was 4%. We aim to document the abandon rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression.

We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients with AIS under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with a self-reported good adherence to treatment and those who voluntarily abandoned treatment during follow-up. Patients with irregular adherence were excluded. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser stage, type of brace, Cobb angles at first visit and last follow-up (mean 11 months) and % of progression. Unpaired student tests were used for comparison.

154 patients met inclusion criteria. 20 patients were excluded due to irregular adherence. 89 patients (age: 12.1 y.o. ±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 45 patients (age: 12.6 y.o. ±1.5) abandoned treatment, an abandon rate of 29%. The cohort of compliant patients started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +0.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was −4.6%. However, patients who abandoned treatment started with a mean MT curve of 28° and finished with 33°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of −11%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (p=0.002). Five (5) patients from the abandon group were offered for surgery because of curve progression.

The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates.

Musculoskeletal tumours are relatively rare and as such, they are not well known by the population and by general practicioners. We observed that an important proportion of our patients has seen major delays at diferent stages of their referral pathway. It is well recognised that such delays can cause avoidable loss of function, local and systemic recurrence and increase in health system costs. The main objective of this study was to prospectively assess the referral paterns of our patients to pinpoint the causes of the delays. This should allow the formation of strategies to minimise delas and their impact. The secondary objective was to assess the performance of our centre in comparaison to other centre with the goal of improving quality of care.

Prospective follow up data is available for 457 patient referred to our musculoskeletal oncology team between july 2011 and november 2014. Every patients filled questionnaires on their initial referral patterns. Site specific function and quality of life are evaluated at baseline and at subsequent follow-up (six months, one year, three years and five years).

The average delay between the first symptoms and the first medical consultation with a general practitioner was 37 weeks (CI: 27–46). The average delay between the first medical consultation and the referral to orthopaedic oncology was 54 weeks (CI: 43–65). The delay between the first consultation with a general practitioner and the first radiologic test was 31 weeks (CI: 22–39). The delay between the first radiologic test and the referral to orthopaedic oncology was 28 weeks (CI 24–32). The delay between the referral to orthopaedic oncology and the first appointment to our centre was three weeks (CI 2–4). Before the referral to our center, 23% of the patients met two general practitioners and 10% met with 3 or more general practitioner. Fifty-two pervent of the patients had a consultation with a specialist and 19% saw two or more specialists.

It is imperative to raise awareness of musculoskeletal tumours and indication for early referral in general practitioners. One of the main problems in our actual referral patern is early access to appropriate imaging. The creation of a referral program with specific guidelines is, in our opinion, the best way to significantly reduce the delays for appropriate management of patients with suspiscion of musculoskeletal tumours.