Valgus unloader knee braces are a conservative treatment option for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). These braces are designed to reduce painful, and potentially injurious compressive loading on the damaged medial side of the joint through application of a frontal-plane abduction moment. While some patients experience improvements in pain, function, and joint loading, others see little to no benefit from bracing [1]. Previous biomechanical studies investigating the mechanical effectiveness of bracing have been limited in either their musculoskeletal detail [2] or incorporation of altered external joint moments and forces [3]. The first objective was to model the relative contributions of gait dynamics, muscle forces, and the external brace abduction moment to reducing medial compartment knee loads. The second objective was to determine what factors predict the effectiveness of the valgus unloading brace.

Seventeen people with knee OA (8 Female age 54.4 +/− 4.2, BMI 30.00 +/− 4.0 kg/m², Kellgren-Lawrence range of 1–4 with med. = 3) and 20 healthy age-matched controls participated in this study which was approved by the institutional ethics review board. Subjects walked across a 20m walkway with and without a Donjoy OA Assist knee brace while marker trajectories, ground reaction forces, and lower limb electromyography were recorded. The external moment applied by the brace was estimated by multiplying the brace deformation by is pre-determined brace-stiffness. For each subject, a representative stride was selected for each brace condition. A generic musculokeletal model with two legs, a torso, and 96 muscles was modified to include subject-specific frontal plane alignment and medial and lateral contact locations [4]. Muscle forces, and tibiofemoral contact forces were estimated using static optimization [4]. We defined brace effectiveness as the difference in the peak medial contact force between the braced and the unbraced conditions. A stepwise regression analysis was performed to predict brace effectiveness based on: X-ray frontal plane alignment, medial joint space, KL grade, mass, WOMAC scores, unbraced walking speed, trunk, hip and knee joint angles and moments.

The OA Assist brace reduced medial joint loading by approximately 0.1 to 0.2 BW or roughly 10%, during stance. This decrease was primarily due to the external brace abduction moment, and not changes in gait dynamics, or muscle forces. The brace effectiveness could be predicted (R²=0.77) by the KL grade, and the magnitude of the hip adduction moment in early stance (unbraced). The brace was more effective for those that had larger hip adduction moments and for those with more severe OA.

The valgus knee brace was found to reduce the medial joint contact force by approximately 10% as estimated using a musculoskeletal model. Bracing resulted in a greater reduction in joint contact force for those who had more severe OA while still maintaining a hip adduction moment similar to that of healthy controls.

Valgus knee unloader braces are often prescribed as treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). These braces are designed to redistribute the loading in the knee, thereby reducing medial contact forces. Patient response to bracing is variable; some patients experience improvements in joint loading, pain, and function, others see little to no effect. We hypothesised that patients who experienced beneficial response to the brace, measured by reductions in medial contact force, could be predicted based on static and dynamic measures.

Participants completed a WOMAC questionnaire and walked overground with and without an OA Assist knee brace in a motion capture lab. Eighteen patients with medial compartment OA (8 female, 53.8±7.0 years, BMI 30.3±4.1, median Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4 (range 1–4)) were evaluated. The abduction moment applied by the brace was estimated by multiplying brace deflection by the pre-determined brace stiffness. A generic musculoskeletal model was scaled for each participant based on standing full length radiographs and anatomical markers. Inverse kinematics, inverse dynamics, residual reduction, and muscle analysis were completed in OpenSim 3.2. A static optimisation was then performed to estimate muscle forces and then tibiofemoral contact forces were calculated. Brace effectiveness was defined by the difference in the first peak of the medial contact force between braced and unbraced conditions. Principal component analysis was performed on the hip, knee, and ankle angles and moments from the unbraced walking condition to extract the principal component (PC) scores for these variables. A linear regression procedure was used to determine which variables related to brace effectiveness. Potential regressors included: hip-knee-ankle angle and medial joint space measured radiographically; KL grade; mass; WOMAC scores; unbraced walking speed; and the first two principal component scores for each of the unbraced hip, knee, and ankle joint angles and moments.

KL grade, walking speed, and hip adduction moment PC1, which represented the magnitude of the first peak were all found to be correlated with change in medial contact force. The brace was more successful in reducing medial contact force in subjects with higher KL grades, faster self-selected walking speeds, and larger peak external hip adduction moments. The R2 value for the overall regression model was 0.78.

The best predictor of brace effectiveness was the hip adduction moment, indicating the need to consider dynamic measures. Participants who had hip adduction moments and walking speeds similar to those of their healthy counterparts saw a greater reduction in medial contact force. Thus, those who responded to bracing had more severe OA as measured by the KL grade but had not experienced changes in their hip adduction moment due to OA. The results of this study suggest that there is potential for an objective criterion for valgus knee brace use to be established.