Since 2012 we have routinely used the cementless Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA), with microplasty instrumentation, in patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) meeting modern indications. We report the 10-year survival of 1000 mUKA with minimum 4-year follow-up. National Joint Registry (NJR) surgeon reports were interrogated for each senior author to identify the first 1,000 mUKAs performed for osteoarthritis. A minimum of 4 years follow-up was required. There was no loss to follow-up. The NJR status of each knee was established. For each mUKA revision the indication and mechanism of failure was determined using local patient records. The 10-year implant survival was calculated using life-table analysis.Abstract
Background
Methods
Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this to study was to compare the previously unreported
long-term survival outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by trainee surgeons and consultants. We therefore identified a previously unreported cohort of 1084
knees in 947 patients who had a UKA inserted for anteromedial knee
arthritis by consultants and surgeons in training, at a tertiary
arthroplasty centre and performed survival analysis on the group
with revision as the endpoint.Aims
Patients and Methods
Establishing a full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment and functionally intact ACL is vital before proceeding with unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study is to assess whether MRI is a useful adjunct in predicting suitability for UKR, as compared to standard and stress radiographs. We identified 50 patients with a knee found suitable for UKR based on their standard and stress radiographs (full-thickness cartilage on lateral side). These patients underwent an additional cartilage-specific MRI scan to identify the status of ACL and the lateral compartment. The final decision regarding the suitability for UKR was based on the intra-operative observation.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) accounts for 84% of all knee replacement surgery in the UK (NJR 2009) despite published epidemiological data showing that single compartment disease is most prevalent. We investigated this incompatibility further by describing the compartmental pattern and stage of cartilage loss of all patients with osteoarthritis (OA) presenting to a specialist knee clinic over one year. All new primary referrals in a calendar year by local General Practitioners to knee clinic at a United Kingdom Hospital were assessed. Tertiary referrals and second opinions were excluded. The final diagnosis after all imaging was recorded and tabulated. The standing AP, lateral and skyline radiographs of all cases of arthritis were scored to assess the pattern of disease.Introduction
Methods
To investigate the linear penetration rate of the polyethylene bearing in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at twenty years. The Phase 1 Oxford medial UKR was introduced in 1978 as a design against wear, with a fully congruous articulation. In 1987 the Phase 2 implant was introduced with new instrumentation and changes to the bearing shape. We have previously shown a linear penetration rate (LPR) of 0.02 mm/year at ten years in Phase 2, but that higher penetration rates can be seen with impingement. The aim of this study was to determine the 20 year in-vivo LPR of the Oxford UKR, using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA).Purpose of study
Introduction
We reviewed the relationship between the pattern of damage to the posterolateral corner of the knee and the position of the common peroneal nerve in 54 consecutive patients with posterolateral corner disruption requiring surgery. We found that 16 of the 18 patients with biceps avulsions or avulsion-fracture of the fibular head had a displaced common peroneal nerve. The nerve was pulled anteriorly with the biceps tendon. None of the 34 proximal injuries resulted in an abnormal nerve position. Whenever bone or soft-tissue avulsion from the fibular head is suspected, the surgeon should expect an abnormal position of the common peroneal nerve and appreciate the increased risk of iatrogenic damage.
