External fixation is widely used in orthopaedic
and trauma surgery. Infections around pin or wire sites, which are usually
localised, non-invasive, and are easily managed, are common. Occasionally,
more serious invasive complications such as necrotising fasciitis
(NF) and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) may occur. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent external
fixation between 1997 and 2012 in our limb lengthening and reconstruction
programme. A total of eight patients (seven female and one male)
with a mean age of 20 years (5 to 45) in which pin/wire track infections
became limb- or life-threatening were identified. Of these, four
were due to TSS and four to NF. Their management is described. A
satisfactory outcome was obtained with early diagnosis and aggressive
medical and surgical treatment. Clinicians caring for patients who have external fixation and
in whom infection has developed should be aware of the possibility
of these more serious complications. Early diagnosis and aggressive
treatment are required in order to obtain a satisfactory outcome. Cite this article:
It would appear that the most successful conservative treatment for clubfoot is the method developed in the late 1940s by Ponseti. We recently reviewed the outcomes of treatment in Afula with the Ponseti method in our first 28 patients with minimum of five years follow-up.
We used the Garceau classification to assess residual deformity. The average scoring was 3.6 points (range 2–4). Twelve feet out of 36 (33%) (excluding the 2 feet who underwent PMR), ended up with some residual supination, according to the Garceau classification, 11 feet rated 3 points each, and only one foot 2 points. Only12 patients were defined as compliant with the use of the foot abduction brace. In seven out of 36 feet (18% of the feet, six patients) tibialis anterior transfer for residual supination was performed, only one of these patients was compliant with the use of the foot abduction brace. However, despite bad compliance with the use of the orthosis, eight out of 16 patients obtained good results. An average of 13 degrees (range. 0–25) of dorsiflexion and 50 degrees (40–70) of plantarflexion was noticed in all 36 feet (again excluded the 2 post PMR feet), and very supple subtalar joints.
Proper use of the foot abduction brace is essential. Those patients who underwent tibials anterior transfer, were non-compliant with the use of the brace. One of our patients whose parents refused to use the orthosis at all required complete open release with the Turco method. Few patients may end up with good result despite bad comliance with the use of the brace. Since this is unpredictable, parents should be recommended to be fully commited as to the use of the brace.
In our study we will review 28 patients suffering from mal- nonunion, whom were treated by an Ilizarov external fixation, and the results of the treatment concerning radiological alignment and consolidation rate.
Malunions were treated either with acute or gradual correction of the deformity, following low energy osteotomy. For hypertrophic nonunion and mal-nonunion in general only distraction compression technique (mono-focal) was used. Atrophic and infected nonunion were treated with a bifocal technique (so-called bone transport), except for one case treated with monofocal technique only.