The value of collared stems for uncemented implants remains controversial. Some comparative studies have demonstrated advantages of collared stems regarding the potential for subsidence. Other studies with longer follow-up have shown no adverse effect of the use of a collar regarding the femoral component survivorship. To date, the adequate size of the collar with regards to the anatomy of the proximal femur has never been studied. The goal of this study was to assess whether the size of the collar needs to be adjusted according to the size of the femoral component used, and according to the use of a standard or a lateralized component. 102 CT of normal femurs have been divided into 2 groups of 51 femurs each. Each group has been analysed by 2 independant surgeons. Each CT view passed through the axis of the proximal diaphysis and the center of the femoral head. The scale was 100%. Templates of femoral components have been set in order to reproduce the center of rotation and an optimal filling of the proximal femoral canal. Sizes of the femoral components as well as the need for standard or lateralized implants have been recorded. In order to determine the ideal size of the collar, the distance between the medial edge of the prothesis and the medial edge of the femur (so-called P-C distance) at the level of the neck cut (calcar) has been measured.Introduction
Materials and Method
Primary mechanical fixation and secondary biologic fixation determine the fixation of an uncemented femoral component. An optimized adequacy between the implant design and the proximal femur morphology allows to secure primary fixation. The femoral antetorsion has to be considered in order to reproduce the center of rotation. A so-called «corrected coronal plane » including the center of the femoral head has therefore been defined. The goal of this study was to evaluate the proximal metaphysal volume and to design a straight femoral component adapted to this corrected coronal plane. 205 CT-scans (performed in 151 males and 54 females free of hip arthritis) have been analyzed with a three-dimensional reconstruction. The mean age was 68.5 years (35–93). A corrected coronal plane has been defined including the center of the femoral head and the axis of the intramedullary canal. Five levels of sections (at a defined distance from the center of the femoral head) have been selected: 12.5mm, 50mm, 70mm, 90mm and 120mm. Three intramedullary criteria have been studied: volume between the 50mm and the 90mm sections (C1), the medial-lateral distance of the intramedullary canal (C2) at the 50mm, 70mm, and 90mm levels, and the A-P distance (C3) at the 50mm, 70mm, and 90mm levels (respectively C3–50, C3–70, and C3–90). The femoral head diameter, the femoral offset and the canal flare index (CT flare) have also been measured.Introduction
Materials and Methods
