Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 29 - 29
2 Jan 2024
Bojan A Procter P Karami P Pioletti D
Full Access

The fixation of articular fractures, with many small osteochondral fragments, is a challenging unmet need where a bone adhesive would be a useful adjunct to standard treatments. Whilst there are no such adhesives in current clinical use, preclinical animal models have demonstrated good healing of bone in unloaded models using an adhesive based on phosphoserine modified calcium phosphate cement (PM-CPC). An ex-vivo human bone core model has shown that this adhesive bonds freshly harvested human bone. To confirm this adhesive is capable of supporting loaded osteochondral fragments a porcine model has been developed initially ex-vivo on the path to an in-vivo study. In this model bone cores, harvested from the medial knee condyle, are glued in place with the adhesive. In-vivo adjacent pairs of bone cores would be replaced with adhesive and a control with conventional pin fixation respectively. As osteochondral bone fragments have both bone and cartilage components, this suggested a dual adhesive strategy in which components designed for each tissue type are used. This concept has been explored in an ex-vivo porcine pilot study presented herewith. At the subchondral bone level, the PM-CPC was used. At the cartilage level, a second adhesive, a methacrylated phosphoserine containing hyaluronic acid (MePHa) hydrogel designed specifically for soft tissues was applied. This is a challenging model as both adhesives have to be used simultaneously in a wet field. The pilot showed that once the subchondral component is glued in place, the PM-CPC adhesive intruding into the cartilage gap can be removed before applying the cartilage adhesive. This enabled the MePHa adhesive to be injected between the cut cartilage edges and subsequently light-cured. This two-stage gluing method is demanding and an in-vivo pilot is necessary to perfect and prove the operative technique.

Acknowledgements: The human bone core project was partially financed by Innovation Fund of Västra Götaland Region, Sweden. The MePHa hydrogel work was supported by a Swiss National Fund grant # CR23I3_159301.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 574 - 574
1 Nov 2011
Bhandari M Bojan A Eckholm C Brink O Adili A Sprague S Hussain N Joensson A
Full Access

Purpose: The popularity of intramedullary nails (IMN) for trochanteric hip fractures has grown substantially with little supportive evidence that IMN are superior to conventional sliding hip screws (SHS). We aimed to assess the impact of SHS or IMN intramedullary nailing on functional outcomes and rates of re-operation in elderly patients with fractures.

Method: We conducted a multi-center, pilot randomized trial including three clinical sites across Sweden, Denmark, and Canada. We randomized 85 elderly patients with stable and unstable trochanteric hip fractures to either SHS or an IMN. The primary outcome, revision surgery, was independently adjudicated at one year. Secondary functional outcomes included the Parker Mobility Score (PMS), the Merle D’Aubigne Score, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the Euroquol-5D.

Results: Eighty five patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients died prior to the one year follow up. Across treatment groups, patients did not differ in age, gender and fracture type. The overall revision risk was 11.6% (8/69) and did not differ significantly between groups (IMN: 5; SHS: 3). Patients treated with IMN had significantly higher Merle D’Aubigne function subscores at 6 (p=0.01) and 12 months (p=0.05). Gamma3 nails approached significantly higher scores in the Parker mobility score at 6 (p=0.08) and 12 months (p=0.056). Non-significant differences were identified in the SF-12 and Euroquol-5D quality of life measures; however, in both scores, the Gamma3 nailed trended to higher scores than the sliding hip screw.

Conclusion: Our findings of early functional gains without increased risk of revision surgery support the increased popularity of IMN for the management of trochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients.