Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its perceived benefits over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), such as greater bone preservation, reduced operating-room time, better post-operative range of motion and improved gait. However there have been failures associated with UKA caused by misalignment of the implants that have lead to revisions. To improve the implant alignment a robotic guidance system called the RIO Robotic Arm has been developed by MAKO Surgical Corp (Ft. Lauderdale, FL), which is designed to give improved accuracy compared to traditional UKA using cutting jigs and other manual instrumentation.

The University of Strathclyde in association with Glasgow Royal Infirmary has undertaken the first independent RCT trial of the MAKO system against the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty – a conventional UKA used in the UK. Motion analysis was used in order to obtain a quantitative assessment of their movement. The results from a total of 51 patients (23 MAKO, 28 Oxford) that underwent a one year post-operative biomechanical assessment were investigated.

Motion analysis showed that during level walking the MAKO group achieved a higher knee excursion during the highest flexion portion of the weight bearing stage of the gait cycle (foot-strike to mid-stance) compared to the Oxford group (18.6° and 15.8° respectively). This difference was statistically significant (p-value = 0.03). Other knee excursion values that were compared were from mid-stance to terminal stance, and overall knee flexion. No statistically significant differences were seen in either of these measurements. A subsequent comparison of both MAKO and Oxford groups with a matched normal cohort (50 patients), demonstrated that there wasn't a statistically significant difference between the MAKO group and the normal knees during mean knee excursion from foot-strike to mid-stance (18.6° and 19.5° respectively, p-value 0.36). However the Oxford group, with a lower knee excursion was found to be significantly different to our normal control group (15.8° and 19.5° respectively, p-value < 0.001).

This suggests that the robotic-assisted knees behaved more similarly to normal gait during this phase of the gait cycle than those of the conventional group. While significant differences in gait were found between the Oxford and MAKO groups, further work is required to determine if this results in improved knee function that is perceptible to the patient.

Time analysis from video footage gives a simple outcome measure of surgical practice against a measured model of use. The added detail that can be produced, over simply recording the usual surgical process data such as tourniquet times, allows us to identify and time the sequence of surgical procedures as stages, to describe issues, and the identification of idiosyncratic behaviours for review and comparison.

Makoplasty (Mako surgical corp. FL, US) partial knee operation times were compared using this technique with those from the Oxford (Biomet, IN, US) partial knee. Three experienced surgeons were observed over 19 Makoplasty procedures ([Consultant 1] 11, [Consultant 2] 5, [Consultant 3] 3) and 2 experienced surgeons over 11 Oxford partial knee procedures ([Consultant 1] 5, [Consultant 2] 6). Times were refined into separate stages that defined the major operative steps of both the Makoplasty and Oxford processes as used by the surgical team at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK. The videos were reviewed for start and stop times for pre-defined actions that would be expected to be observed during each surgical process and from these stage lengths were calculated. For both the Oxford and Mako system 12 comparable stages were identified for comparison and the timing of the various episodes was tested for statistical significance using a Two-Sample, two tail, t-Test. assuming Equal Variances. [Stages: 1. Setup time, 2. Patient on table, 3. Skin incision, 4. Joint Prep, 5. Robot registration (Not in Oxford), 6. Tibial resection, 7. Femoral resection, 8. Trials, 9. Finishing, 10. Cementing and Washout, 11. Closure and dressing, 12. Off table]

The MAKOplasty procedures were on average longer than Oxfords by 27 minutes. This can largely be accounted for in the additional setup stage 4, where in addition to the usual joint preparation taking a couple of minutes approximately 17 minutes were spent in the MAKO cases undertaking image registration and in stage 5 where nearly five minutes were spent in setting up the robot in the MAKO cases.

In conclusion while operative times fell for the Makoplasties across the learning curve they remained elevated once the plateau was reached. It should be remembered that the surgeons had much less experience with the Makoplasty procedure and were undertaking a randomised clinical trial of outcome and hence were not minded to perform the surgery quickly but to the best of their ability and that this may account for some of the elongated surgical time. Indeed other Makoplasty surgeons report an average surgical time of 30–45 minutes per case and 6 cases per day. What is striking is that the additional steps of registration and robot positioning account for a large proportion of the differences and these are mitigated to some extent by quicker trialling of the implant and finishing of the cuts suggesting more confidence in the suitability of the cut surfaces. There is clearly a need to reduce the registration time to produce more cost effective surgeries.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been established as a successful procedure for relieving pain and improving function in patients suffering from severe knee osteoarthritis for several decades now. It involves removing bone from both the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and sacrificing one or both of the cruciate ligaments. This in turn is likely to have an impact on the patients' functional outcome. In subjects where only one compartment of the knee joint is affected with osteoarthritis then unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been proposed as an alternative procedure to TKA. This operation preserves the cruciate ligaments and removes bone only from the affected side of the joint. As a result there is the possibility of an improved functional outcome post surgery. UKA has been associated with faster recovery, good functional outcome in terms of range of motion and it is bone sparing compared to TKA. However, the biggest obstacle to UKA success is the high failure rates.

The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of computer navigated TKA (n=60) and UKA (n=42) patients 12 month post operation using flexible electrogoniometry. Flexible electrogoniometry was used to investigate knee joint kinematics during gait, slopes walking, stair negotiation, and when using standard and low chairs. Maximum, minimum and excursion knee joint angles were calculated for each task.

The biomechanical assessment showed statistically significant improvements in the knee kinematics in terms of maximum (p<0.0004) and excursion (p<0.026) knee joint angles in the UKA patient group compared to the navigated TKA group for each of the functional tasks. There was no statistically significant difference between the minimum knee joint angles during these functional tasks (p>0.05).

Therefore, UKA patients were showed to have a significantly better functional outcome in terms of the maximum knee joint angle during daily tasks. A limitation of this study is that it compares two cohorts rather than two randomised groups. It is expected that UKA patients will have a better functional outcome. Our results suggest that for patients with less severe knee osteoarthritis, UKA may offer a better functional outcome than the more common surgical option of TKA. The recent advancements in computer assisted and robotic assisted knee arthroplasty has the possibility to improve the accuracy of UKA and therefore led to the increase in confidence and in usage in a procedure which has the potential to give patients a superior functional outcome.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its perceived benefits over total knee replacements, such as greater bone preservation, reduced operating-room time, better postoperative range of motion and improved gait. However there have been failures associated with UKA caused by misalignment of the implants.

To improve the implant alignment a robotic guidance system called the RIO Robotic Arm has been developed by MAKO Surgical Corp (Ft. Lauderdale, FL). This robotic system provides real-time tactile feedback to the surgeon during bone cutting, designed to give improved accuracy compared to traditional UKA using cutting jigs and other manual instrumentation.

The University of Strathclyde in association with Glasgow Royal Infirmary has undertaken the first independent Randomised Control Trial (RCT) of the MAKO system against the Oxford UKA – a conventional UKA used in the UK. The trial involves 139 patients across the two groups.

At present the outcomes have been evaluated for 30 patients. 14 have received the MAKO unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 16 the Oxford UKA. Both groups were seen 1 year post-operatively. Kinematic data was collected while subjects completed level walking using a Vicon Nexus motion analysis system. Three-dimensional hip, knee and ankle angles were compared between the two arthroplasty groups.

Our initial findings indicate that hip and ankle angles show no significant statistical difference, however there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the knee angles during the stance phase of gait. Data shows higher angles achieved by the MAKO group over the Oxford.

It would appear from our early findings that the MAKO RIO procedure with Restoris implants gives at least comparable functional outcome with the conventional Oxford system and may prove once our full sample is available for analysis to produce better stance phase kinematics with a more active gait pattern than the conventional Oxford procedure.

Further work includes analysing the data obtained from the patients in a number of other activities. These include a full biomechanical analysis of ascending and descending a flight of stairs, sit to stand and a deep knee lunge. The high demand/high flexion tasks in particular may reveal if there's an advantage to using the MAKO procedure over the Oxford. If there is a direct correlation between alignment and patient function then this effect could be more significant in the more demanding patient tasks.

This RCT compared electromagnetic (EM) navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of clinical and functional outcomes. 200 patients (navigated=102, conventional=98) were recruited. Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) were recorded pre operation, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Post operative (coronal, sagittal and rotational) alignment was analysed from 3D CT scans taken 3 months after surgery. An objective functional assessment was completed using electrogoniometry on a sub group (navigated=60, conventional=57) at 12 months post surgery.

The EM group showed statistically significantly improved OKS (p=0.04) and AKSS (p=0.03) scores at 3 months post operation. However at 12 months post surgery there was no difference between the two groups. At the 1 year follow up it was reported that 9% of the navigated compared to 14% of the conventional group were dissatisfied with their surgical outcome.

The mechanical axis alignment of 90% of the navigated group was within 3 degrees of neutral compared to 84% of the conventional group. Although all alignment parameters except for tibial rotation was improved in the navigated group they did not reach significance apart from femoral slope alignment (p=0.01).

There was no statistically difference between the surgical groups in terms of the maximum, minimum and excursion knee joint angles during 12 functional activities. Only the knee kinematic function cycles for level walking resulted in statistically significant higher knee joint angles during 55–70% of the gait cycle in the navigated group.

Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical and functional improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. The EM group reported minimal gait improvements. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge.

A retrospective analysis was carried out to determine the influence of pre-existing spinal pathology on the outcome of Total Knee Replacement surgery. Data was collected from 345 patients who had undergone Total Knee Replacement, at four centres in the UK, between 2000 and 2007. Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), American Knee Society Scores (AKSS) and SF-12 questionnaires were recorded prospectively. Data was collected pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. Patients were divided into those with (n=40) and without a history of low back pain (n=305). In addition to determining the influence of low back pain on outcome after Total Knee Replacement we also examined the influence of concomitant hip and ankle pathology in the same cohort of patients.

OKS scores were significantly worse for patients with symptomatic low back pain at 3 (p=0.05), 12 (p=0.009) and 24 months (p=0.039) following surgery. SF-12 physical scores followed a comparable pattern with significance demonstrated at 3 (p=0.038), 12 (p=0.0002) and 24 months (p=0.016). AKSS followed a similar pattern, but significance was only reached at 1 year (p=0.013). The mental component of the SF-12 measure demonstrated a significant improvement in patients' mental health post-operatively for patients with no history of low back pain. In contrast patients with low back pain showed no improvement in mental health scores post-operatively.

In contrast to low back pain, hip and ankle pathology had no statistically significant detrimental effect on the outcome of Total Knee Replacement surgery.

This study demonstrates that low back pain significantly affects the functional outcome after Total Knee Replacement surgery and that patients with low back pain show no improvement in mental health post-operatively.

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of electromagnetic (EM) navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on post operative function.

In this double blinded randomised control trial, patients with osteoarthritis either received TKA using conventional techniques (n = 49) or EM navigation (iNav Portable Navigation System, Zimmer Orthopaedics) (n = 52). All of the patients were reviewed in the Outcomes Clinic at 3 and 12 months. At 12 months post operation the patients completed an objective biomechanical functional assessment using flexible electrogoniometers, which recorded dynamic knee kinematics during daily activities. Knee joint flexion and extension moments were recorded at the 12 month post operation assessment. The functional assessment included validated questionnaires (Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis to assess component alignment.

Improved alignment was recorded in the navigated group. However there was no significantly significant difference between the two surgical groups in terms of the subjective questionnaire scores. The biomechanical assessment showed no statistically significant differences in the maximum, minimum or excursion knee joint angles between the two surgical groups during the 12 daily functional tasks. However, significant differences were reported in level and slope walking activities during pre-swing phase (at around 60% of the gait cycle). The navigated group had significantly higher knee joint angles during pre swing suggesting a more vigorous push off into swing phase and a more ‘normal’ gait cycle. The two surgical groups were sub divided into males and females for the strength test. The female navigated group recorded a significantly greater hamstring (p = 0.03) and quadriceps (p = 0.003) moment. There was no significant difference in hamstring or quadriceps moments between the navigated and conventional male groups.

The knee kinematics and moment data suggests that the navigated group had an improved functional outcome. However the difference in the post-operation function of the two groups remains minimal despite the better alignment achieved using navigation.

Aim

The aim of the study was to assess the impact of a self aligning unidirectional mobile tibial bearing and the use of a patella button on lateral patella release rates within a knee system using a common femoral component for both the fixed and mobile variants.