To critically evaluate exciting new technology to reconstruct menisci for the treatment of post menisectomy pain and relate results to indication and surgical technique in a non-inventor's general knee practice. We present our early experience of two non-comparative series with different meniscal implants. Series 1: Thirteen patients received a Menaflex implant (Regen Bio, USA). Mean age 30, male/female 11/2, mean length of implant 44mm, mean chondral grade 1.9 (Outerbridge). At 24 months clinical scores showed improvement in 12. Second look arthroscopy in 5 however showed disappointing amounts of regenerative tissue. One patient has been revised. Series 2: Twelve patients received an Actifit implant (Orteq, UK). Mean age 38, male/female 8/4, mean length implant 43 mm, mean chondral grade 1.3. At 12 months all have improved clinical scores. We have performed two second looks, one of these showed excellent integration. However one showed only 50% regeneration. Critical review of the initial implantation shows that there may not have been adequate preparation of the host meniscus tissue.Purpose
Methods
Recent advances in understanding of ACL insertional anatomy has led to new concepts of anatomical positioning of tunnels for ACL reconstruction. Femoral tunnel position has been defined in terms of the lateral intercondylar ridge and the bifurcate ridge but these can be difficult to identify at surgery. Measurements of the lateral wall either using C-arm x-ray control or specific arthroscopic rulers have also been advocated. 30 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction before and after introduction of a new anatomical technique of ACL reconstruction were evaluated using 3D CT scan imaging with cut away views of the lateral aspect of the femoral notch and the radiological quadrant grid. In the new technique, with the knee at 90 degrees flexion, the femoral tunnel was centred 50% from deep to shallow as seen from the medial portal (Group A). Group B consisted of patients where the femoral tunnel was drilled through the antero-medial portal and offset from the posterior wall using a 5mm jig.Hypothesis
Method
It is difficult to estimate the true cost to the Trust for a cancelled case. Each cancelled case is a ‘slot’ on an operating list that has not been filled. There are regular Waiting List Initiative (WLI) Lists – the number of these have increased. Could an empty slot on a regular list have been filled by a WLI case? Would the cost of the WLI case theoretically performed in the empty slot be the cost of the cancelled case? The model is basic and has many assumptions. Patients are allocated a slot on a WLI list for a variety of reasons, however with enough numbers and across enough time, the true cost must be somewhere near these figures.
The total number of WLI cases in the same period and the total cost of those cases.
Cases Cost: £3,234,000 (£2,065 per case)
The Clinical Medical Group in Southern Iraq was opened on 24 March 2003. Since then the hospital has received 4583 inpatients of which 1762 have been surgical admissions. The aim of this paper is to discuss the number, severity, mechanism of injury and overall outcome of all the orthopaedic admissions seen within the hospital complex, including all serving personnel, foreign employed nationals and foreign civilians treated. Particular reference will be made to the percentage of admissions returned to front line activities and a comparison of this percentage made with general surgical and medical admissions. Data for this retrospective review has been obtained from the hospital, operating theatre and patient records currently held in theatre.
