Birmingham Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing (BHR) is a bone-conserving option for patients with advanced articular damage. While the outcomes of Total Hip Replacement (THR) are well documented, there is a paucity of literature comparing the patient reported outcomes of BHR versus THR. This study aims to compare the patient reported outcomes for an impact on quality of life between patients who had a BHR vs. THR after correcting for selection bias. Patients who underwent a BHR or THR between July 2003 and December 2006 were included. Patient questionnaires included demographic details, co-morbidities, WOMAC, SF-36 Scores. In addition, a 4 point Likert scale was used to measure satisfaction post-operatively. The above data was collected pre-operatively and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years post-operatively. Data was analysed with SPSS (version 19) software package. All analysis was adjusted for Age, gender, Co-morbidity and pre-operative score by using Multivariate regression analysis using a General Liner Model to rule out the effect of these predictors on outcomes between groups. 337 patients were included (205 for THR and 132 for BHR). BHR patients were younger than THR patients (49 vs. 67 years, p<0.01), were more likely to be male (68% vs. 42% of THR, p<0.01), reported fewer co-morbidities (1.06 vs. 1.59, p<0.01). BHR patients reported better WOMAC pain and function scores at 5 years (p<0.05). For SF-36 scores, BHR patients reported higher scores for all 8 domains at 1 year and 5 year follow up (p<0.05). BHR patients reported higher satisfaction than THR group for return to Activities of Daily Living and Recreational activities at 1 and 5 years (p<0.05) After correction for patient variability, BHR patients reported better improvement in pain and function and enjoyed a better quality of life in relation to return to ADL and recreational activities over to 5 years post-surgery.
There is less literature reporting outcomes following total ankle replacement (TAR) in patients presenting with a coronal plane deformity preoperatively. This study compares clinical and patient reported outcomes at 1 year between TAR patients with and without coronal plane deformity. Patients from single centre prospective cohort (132) who underwent TAR between 2006 and 2010 were included. They were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative coronal plane deformity. Groups 1 and 2 had a coronal plane deformity of <10 and >10 respectively. Assessments included American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), SF-36 (Generic Health Measure) and complications recorded preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.Introduction
Methods
This project highlights the red flags in postoperative rehabilitation of total ankle replacement (TAR) patients managed with two different postoperative rehab regimes. 20 TAR patients were recruited for a pilot RCT between 2008 and 2011; they were randomized to 2 groups (immobilisation in a below knee plaster cast for 6 weeks vs. early mobilisation following TAR); all patients underwent a graded outpatient Physiotherapy program until 12 weeks postoperatively. Assessments included questionnaires, complications, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) done preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery 20 TARs for OA (13) and PTOA (7) took part in the trial. There were 10 patients in each arm of the study. Mean age 61.2 years; mean BMI was 29.4. Of the plaster group, there was 1 incidence of fracture medial These results highlights the need for considering a lighter exercise regime, and re-evaluating patient lifestyle, return to recreational activities and feedback on home exercise programs during planning and execution of each phase of postoperative rehabilitation programs to aid prevention of early fractures in patients following TAR.Results
Conclusion
We compared patient-reported outcomes of the Kinemax fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to the fixed- or the mobile-bearing prosthesis via a sealed envelope method after the bone cuts had been made in the operating theatre. Randomisation was stratified by centre and diagnosis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at eight to 12 weeks, one year and two years post-operatively. Validated questionnaires were used which included the Western Ontario MacMasters University, Short-Form 12, Mental Health Index-5, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Knee-Related Quality of Life and Function in Sport and Recreation scales and a validated scale of satisfaction post-operatively. In total, 242 patients (250 knees) with a mean age of 68 years (40 to 80) were recruited from four NHS orthopaedic centres. Of these, 132 patients (54.5%) were women. No statistically significant differences could be identified in any of the patient-reported outcome scores between patients who received the fixed-bearing or the mobile-bearing knee up to two-years post-operatively.
