Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a serious health concern, requiring novel therapeutic options. Walking mechanics has long been identified as an important factor in the OA process. Specially, a larger peak knee adduction moment during the first half of stance (KAM) has been associated with the progression of medial knee OA. Consequently, various gait interventions have been designed to reduce the KAM, including walking with a decreased foot progression angle (FPA). Other gait variables have recently been associated with medial knee OA progression, particularly a larger peak knee flexion moment during stance (KFM) and a larger knee flexion angle at heel-strike (KFA). Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of reducing the FPA on the KFM and KFA.

This study aimed to test for correlations between the FPA and the KAM, KFM and KFA. It was hypothesized that reducing the FPA is beneficial with respect to these three OA-related gait variables.

Seven healthy subjects participated in this study after providing informed consent (4 male; 24 ± 5 years old; 21.9 ± 1.5 kg/m^2). Their walking mechanics was determined using a validated procedure based on a camera-based system (Vicon) and floor-mounted forceplates (Kistler). Participants were first asked to walk without instructions and these initial trials were used to determine their normal footstep characteristics. Then, footsteps with the same characteristics as during the normal trials, except for the FPA, were displayed on the floor and participants were requested to walk following these footsteps. Nine trials with visual instructions were collected for each participant, corresponding to FPA modifications in the range ± 20° compared to the normal FPA, with 5° increment. For each participant, the associations between FPA and knee biomechanics (KAM, KFM and KFA) were assessed using Pearson correlations based on the data from the 9 trials with FPA variations. Significant level was set a priori to 5%.

Significant correlations were noted between FPA and KAM for 5 out of the 7 participants, with R comprised between 0.75 and 0.96. Four participants also reported significant correlations between FPA and KFA (−0.88<R<−0.69). Significant correlations between FPA and KFM were observed in 2 participants, with inconsistent R (−0.68 and 0.78). There was no significant correlation between FPA and walking speed for none of the participants.

While the results confirmed that decreasing the FPA (toeing in) is often associated with a KAM reduction, they also showed relationships between decreased FPA and increased KFA. Therefore, this study suggests that reducing the FPA should be done in consideration of the possible negative changes in KFA. Similarly, although only one participant increased the KFM when decreasing the FPA, it seems important monitoring the effects FPA modifications could have on the KFM. The large variations observed among participants further suggest individualized gait modifications. This study should be extended to medial knee OA patients and longitudinal research is necessary to better understand the effects of decreasing the FPA.