Proponents of quadriceps-sparing (QS) subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) suggest short-term advantages including better early functional results, less pain and shorter hospital stay. However, because of potentially reduced visibility and exposure, the QS approach may compromise component alignment – an important surgeon-controlled outcome affecting implant longevity. The purpose of this study was to determine if a QS approach resulted in compromised component alignment compared to a medial parapatellar arthrotomy (MPPA), when both were performed with contemporary minimally invasive surgery (MIS) principles including small incision (≤ 15 cm), MIS instrumentation, patellar subluxation without eversion, and in situ bone cuts. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled 128 patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA using the same cemented, posterior-stabilized prosthesis. After skin incision, patients were randomized to MPPA (n = 66) or QS technique (n = 62), with all surgeries performed by two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Using the Knee Society roentgenographic evaluation system, two reviewers blinded to the surgical approach evaluated post-operative radiographs to measure coronal and sagittal plane alignment using the standing femoral and tibial angles as well as the lateral femoral flexion and tibial angles. Inter-observer agreement was ensured by a secondary review of all x-rays where the two observers differed by more than 1 degree in their measurements of a specific radiograph. Differences in mean angles were evaluated using the general linear model and differences in proportions were evaluated using binary regression. All analyses were conducted with SAS 9.3 on the Windows Ultimate 64-bit operating system.Introduction:
Methods:
