Component positioning of an artificial hip joint plays a key role in durability of implant. Despite the fact that a number of numerical, experimental and clinical studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of cup inclination on polyethylene wear, steep inclination has been reported to be associated with both high and low volumetric wear. Moreover, how cup anteversion affects wear and its interaction with inclination are still unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, in this study wear and contact mechanics of a hip joint under various cup positioning has been investigated by using FEA (Finite Element Analysis). A Pinnacle® Marathon neutral liner 36×56mm was chosen to model the wear and creep over 3 million cycles (mc) based on the Archard's law and modified time hardening model in ANSYS, respectively. Central composite design of response surface method was used to generate 9 FEA runs, where the operative inclination angles varied from 35º, 45º to 55º and operative anteversion angles differed amongst 0º, 15º and 30º. The range of cup angles were chosen to be similar to the Lewinnek “golden” safe zone for dislocation. The gait cycle as specified in ISO 14242-1 was applied to the femoral head.INTRODUCTION
METHOD
Mismatch of bearing component centres and tension of soft tissues surrounding the hip joint can lead to component separation during gait cycle and cause the femoral head to contact the rim of an acetabular liner, which could increase wear and shorten lifespan of an implant. This study aims to investigate the contact and wear mechanics of a metal-on-polyethylene hip joint under dynamic separation by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). A Pinnacle® cup with a Marathon neutral liner 36×56mm with a 45° inclination was constrained by a spring element in the medial-lateral axis. The spring was pre-compressed by 4mm to represent the corresponding translational mismatch of a simulator testing. Archard's law was used to predict wear over one ISO 14242-1 gait cycle. Contact pressure is proportional to the load input during the stance phase, associated with concentric contact condition; it increases threefold just before the swing phase (time C), reaching 46.2MPa, where edge loading occurs. Consequently, separation climbs to 3.54mm, which is comparable to the mathematical prediction (3.34mm) and dynamic FEA (3.2mm). The predicted volumetric wear after this gait cycle is 1.22 × 10–5 mm3. Dynamic separation between femoral head and acetabular liner can result in edge loading, consequently high contact pressure on the edge of a liner. In combination with cyclic loading, fatigue damage could take place and may be worth investigating in the future.
