To assess outcomes of manipulating upper extremity fractures with conscious sedation compared with formal reduction and casting in theatre under general anaesthesia and image intensifier control. Prospective six month period all patients presenting to the Emergency Department with a both bone forearm or distal radial fracture that was deemed suitable for closed reduction and casting where included in the study. All fractures deemed to require instrumentation were excluded.Purpose
Method
By the end of training, every registrar is expected to demonstrate proficiency in total knee replacement (TKR). It is unclear whether functional outcomes for knee arthroplasty performed by training grade doctors under supervision of a consultant have equivalent functional outcomes to those performed by consultants. This study investigated the functional outcomes following TKR in patients operated on by a supervised orthopaedic trainee compared to a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Patients undergoing surgery by a consultant (n=491) or by a trainee under supervision (n=145) between 2003 and 2006 were included. There was a single implant, approach and postoperative rehabilitation regime. Patients were reviewed eighteen months, three years and five years postoperatively. There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics between the groups. There was no difference in length of stay or transfusion or tourniquet time. Both consultant (p<0.001) and trainee (p<0.001) groups showed significant improvement in AKSK and AKSF scores between preoperative and 18 month review and there was no difference in the magnitude of observed improvement between groups (AKSK p=0.853; AKSF p=0.970). There were no significant differences in either score between the groups preoperatively or at any review point postoperatively. At five years postoperative, both groups had a median OKS of 34 (p=0.921). This is the largest reported series of outcomes following primary TKR examining functional outcome linked with grade of surgeon. It shows that a supervised trainee will achieve comparable functional outcomes at up to 5 years post operatively.
Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is the second most common metabolic bone disease. Osteoarthritis (OA) affects one-third of patients with PDB. The incidence of THR (total hip replacement) and TKR (total knee replacement) is 3.1- and 1.7-fold higher in PDB patients compared to non-affected age-matched controls. No large studies or joint registry reports exist describing the outcomes following THR or TKR in patients with PDB. The objectives of this study were to investigate the outcomes following THR and TKR in patients with PDB using national joint registry data. 144 THR and 43 TKR were identified using the Scottish Arthroplasty Project from 1996–2013. For THR, the most common early post-operative surgical complications were haematoma formation (1.4%), and surgical site infection (1.4%). The absolute incidence during follow-up of dislocation was 2.8%, and revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 2.8% of cases. Implant survival of the primary prosthesis was 96.3% (CI: 92.8 – 99.8) at 10-years, and patient survival was 50.0% (39.6 – 60.4) at 10-years. For TKR, the most common early post-operative surgical complication was surgical site infection (2.3%). The absolute incidence during follow-up of revision knee arthroplasty was 4.7%. On survival analysis, implant survival of the primary prosthesis was 94.5% (CI: 87.1 – 100) at 10-years, and patient survival was 38.3% (16.7 – 59.9) at 10-years. This is the largest reported series of outcomes following primary THR and TKR in patients with PDB. PDB patients are not at increased risk of surgical complications following primary THR or TKR compared to non-PDB patients.
The natural history of primary anterior glenohumeral dislocation in adolescent patients remains unclear and no consensus exists for management of these patients. The study objectives were to report the natural history following primary anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation in adolescent patients and to identify risk factors for repeat dislocation. We reviewed prospectively-collected clinical and radiological data of 133 adolescent patients (mean age 16.3 years (range 13–18); 115 male patients (86.5%)) diagnosed with primary anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation and managed nonoperatively from 1996 to 2008 at our institution (mean follow-up 95.2 months (range 1–215)). During follow-up, 102 (absolute incidence of 76.7%) patients experienced repeat dislocation. Median time interval between primary and repeat dislocation was 10 months (CI: 7.4 – 12.6). On survival analysis, 59% (CI: 51.2 – 66.8%) of patients remained stable one year following initial injury, 38% (CI: 30.2 – 45.8%) after two years, 21% (CI: 13.2- 28.8%) after five years, and 7% (CI: 1.1–12.9%) after 10 years. Neither age nor gender significantly predicted repeat dislocation during follow-up. In conclusion, adolescent patients with primary anterior glenohumeral joint dislocations have a high rate of repeat dislocation, which usually occurs within two years of initial injury, and these patients should be considered early for operative stabilisation.
The natural history of primary anterior dislocation
of the glenohumeral joint in adolescent patients remains unclear and
there is no consensus for management of these patients. The objectives of this study were to report the natural history
of primary anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint in adolescent
patients and to identify the risk factors for recurrent dislocation. We reviewed prospectively-collected clinical and radiological
data on 133 adolescent patients diagnosed with a primary anterior
dislocation of the glenohumeral joint who had been managed non-operatively
at our hospital between 1996 and 2008. There were 115 male (86.5%)
and 18 female patients (13.5%) with a mean age of 16.3 years (13
to 18) and a mean follow-up of 95.2 months (1 to 215). During follow-up, 102 (absolute incidence of 76.7%) patients
had a recurrent dislocation. The median interval between primary
and recurrent dislocation was ten months (95% CI 7.4 to 12.6). Applying
survival analysis the likelihood of having a stable shoulder one
year after the initial injury was 59% (95% CI 51.2 to 66.8), 38%
(95% CI 30.2 to 45.8%) after two years, 21% (95% CI 13.2 to 28.8)
after five years, and 7% (95% CI 1.1 to 12.9) after ten years. Neither
age nor gender significantly predicted recurrent dislocation during
follow-up. We conclude that adolescent patients with a primary anterior
dislocation of the glenohumeral joint have a high rate of recurrent
dislocation, which usually occurs within two years of their initial
injury: these patients should be considered for early operative
stabilisation. Cite this article:
Soft tissue balancing is critical to successful knee arthroplasty. Pre-operative planning ensures that the surgeon is prepared for any eventuality. We report a large femoral exostosis resulting in gross instability, requiring revision to a constrained implant. An 81 year old female presented with osteoarthritis of the left knee. Xray showed a medial bony mass. CT noted a large bony exostosis arising from the posteromedial femoral condyle. Review showed the exostosis was not related to the medial collateral ligament (MCL). At surgery, the exostosis was noted to be tenting the MCL – excision resulted in complete flaccidity. A trial of the Biomet AGC prosthesis revealed gross medial instability. The decision was taken to convert to a DePuy Sigma TC3 system. Whilst removing TC3 trial components, a lateral condyle fracture occurred. This was fixed with a 1/3 tubular plate and interfragmentary screw. The TC3 system and an AGC patellar button were found to be congruent. A small lateral release was performed, the deep MCL was replaced with tagging sutures through the MCL and the pes anserinus. At 9 weeks post operatively, the patient was pain free and mobilising independently. The knee was stable, with range of movement from 0 to 110 degrees. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such a complication in the literature. It highlights that despite optimal preoperative planning, the surgeon must be prepared to adapt to the situation at hand. It also highlights the importance of having ‘bail out’ options available on shelf when performing routine surgery.
The collective orthopaedic literature appears to highlight the Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal, as being slow to heal, and having a high incidence of non-union. There remains a lot of confusion, throughout the orthopaedic literature, about the exact nature of this fracture.
The authors present the largest case series currently published of 117 patients who sustained a Jones fracture, demonstrating patient outcomes with different modalities of care. All Medical notes from the Emergency Department are recorded on a database. A computer program was use to search the Emergency department database of the Edinburgh Royal infirmary notes data base for the terms 5th metatarsal combined with a coding for referral to fracture clinic over a 6 years period from 2004–2010. The researchers went through the X-ray archive, identified and classified all 5th metatarsal fractures. There were 117 patients in our series, refracture rate 7/117 6%. Average time to discharge 13 weeks (4–24). 18% of patients took longer than 18 weeks for their fracture to clinically heal. 34% were clinically healed at less than six weeks, with only 7% radiologically healed at six weeks. There was no significant difference in outcome between cast, moonboot, tubigrip or hard shoe in terms of outcome. A large proportion of Jones fractures have delayed healing, patients who are clinically asymptomatic may not have radiological healing. Currently in our practice there is no uniform management of Jones fractures. We discuss the difference in healing rates for different management techniques.
