Tendons and tendon-to-bone entheses don't usually regenerate after injury, and the hierarchical organization of such tissues makes them challenging sites of study for tissue engineers. In this study, we have tried a novel approach using miRNA and a bioactive bioink to stimulate the regeneration of the enthesis. microRNAs (miRNAs) are short, non-coding sequences of RNA that act as post-transcriptional regulators of gene and protein expression [1]. Mimics or inhibitors of specific miRNAs can be used to restore lost functions at the cell level or improve healing at the tissue level [2,3]. We characterized the healing of a rat patellar enthesis and found that miRNA-16-5p was upregulated in the fibrotic portion of the injured tissue 10 days after the injury. Based on the reported interactions of miRNA-16-5p with the TGF-β pathway via targeting of SMAD3, we aimed to explore the effects of miRNA-16-5p mimics on the tenogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) encapsulated in a bioactive bioink [4,5]. Bioinks with different properties are used for the 3D printing of biomimetic constructs. By integrating cells, materials, and bioactive molecules it is possible to tailor the regenerative capacity of the ink to meet the particular requirements of the tissue to engineer [5]. Here we have encapsulated ASCs in a gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMa) bioink that incorporates miR-16-5p mimics and magnetically responsive microfibers (MRFs). When the bioink is crosslinked in the presence of a magnetic field, the MRFs align unidirectionally to create an anisotropic construct with the ability to promote the tenogenic differentiation of the encapsulated ASCs. Additionally, the obtained GelMA hydrogels retained the encapsulated miRNA probes, which permitted the effective 3D transfection of the ASC and therefore, the regulation of gene expression, allowing to investigate the effects of the miR-16-5p mimics on the tenogenic differentiation of the ASCs in a biomimetic scenario.

Critical-sized bone defects remain challenging in the clinical setting. Autologous bone grafting remains preferred by clinicians. However, the use of autologous tissue is associated with donor-site morbidity and limited accessibility to the graft tissue. Advances in the development of synthetic bone substitutes focus on improving their osteoinductive properties. Whereas osteoinductivity has been demonstrated with ceramics, it is still a challenge in case of polymeric composites. One of the approaches to improve the regenerative properties of biomaterials, without changing their synthetic character, is the addition of inorganic ions with known osteogenic and angiogenic properties. We have previously reported that the use of a bioactive composite with high ceramic content composed of poly(ethyleneoxide terephthalate)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (1000PEOT70PBT30, PolyActive, PA) and 50% beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) with the addition of zinc in a form of a coating of the TCP particles can enhance the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) (3). To further support the regenerative properties of these scaffolds, inorganic ions with known angiogenic properties, copper or cobalt, were added to the coating solution.

β-TCP particles were immersed in a zinc and copper or zinc and cobalt solution with a concentration of 15 or 45 mM. 3D porous scaffolds composed of 1000PEOT70PBT30 and pure or coated β-TCP were additively manufactured by 3D fibre deposition. The osteogenic and angiogenic properties of the fabricated scaffolds were tested in vitro through culture with hMSCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells, respectively. The materials were further evaluated through ectopic implantation in an in vivo mini-pig model. The early expression of relevant osteogenic gene markers (collagen-1, osteocalcin) of hMSCs was upregulated in the presence of lower concentration of inorganic ions. Further analysis will focus on the evaluation of ectopic bone formation and vascularisation of these scaffolds after implantation in a mini-pig ectopic intramuscular model.

Bone homeostasis is a highly regulated process involving pathways in bone as WNT, FGF or BMP, but also requiring support from surrounding tissues as vessels and nerves. In bone diseases, the bone-vessel-nerve triad is impacted. Recently, new players appeared as regulators of bone homeostasis: microRNAs (miRNA). Five miRNAs associated with osteoporotic fractures are already known, among which miR-125b is decreasing bone formation by downregulating human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) differentiation. Other miRNAs, as miR-214 (in cluster with miR-199a), are secreted by osteoclasts to regulate osteoblasts and inhibit bone formation. This forms a very complex regulatory network.

hMSCs and osteoblasts (n=3) were transfected with mimic/antagomiR of miR-125b, miR-199a-5p or miR-214, or with a scrambled miRNA (negative control) in osteogenic differentiation calcium-enriched medium (Ca++). Mineralization was assessed by Alizarin Red/CPC staining, miRNA expression by qPCR and protein by western blotting.

Exposure of hMSCs or osteoblasts to Ca++ increased mineralization compared to basal medium. hMSCs transfected with miR-125b mimic in Ca++ presented less mineralization compared to scramble. This correlated with decreased levels of BMPR2 and RUNX2. hMSCs transfected with miR-125b inhibitor presented higher mineralization. Interestingly, hMSCs transfected with miR-214 mimic in Ca++ presented no mineralization while miR-214 inhibitor increased mineralization. No differences were observed in hMSCs transfected with miR-199a-5p modulators. On the contrary, osteoblasts transfected with miR-199a-5p mimic present less mineralization than scrambled-transfected and same was observed for miR-214 and miR-125b mimics.

We highlight that miR-125b and miR-214 decrease mineralization of hMSCs in calcium-enriched medium. We noticed that miR-199a-5p is able to regulate mineralization in osteoblasts but not in hMSCs suggesting that this effect is cell-specific. Interestingly, the cluster miR-199a/214 is known as modulator of vascular function and could thus contribute to bone remodeling via different ways. With this work we slightly open the door to possible therapeutic approaches for bone diseases.

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been widely investigated for treating non-healing fractures. They participate in bone reconstruction by inducing osteoblast differentiation, and osteoid matrix production.¹ The human recombinant protein of BMP-7 was among the first growth factors approved for clinical use. Despite achieving comparable results to autologous bone grafting, severe side effects have been associated with its use.² Furthermore, BMP-7 was removed from the market.³ These complications are related to the high doses used (1.5-40 miligrams per surgery)² compared to the physiological concentration of BMP in fracture healing (in the nanogram to picogram per milliliter range).⁴ In this study, we use transcript therapy to deliver chemically modified mRNA (cmRNA) encoding BMP-7. Compared to direct use of proteins, transcript therapy allows the sustained synthesis of proteins with native conformation and true post-translational modifications using doses comparable to the physiological ones.⁵ Moreover, cmRNA technology overcomes the safety and affordability limitations of standard gene therapy i.e. pDNA.⁶ BMP-7 cmRNA was delivered using Lipofectamine™ MessengerMAX™ to human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs). We assessed protein expression and osteogenic capacity of hMSCs in monolayer culture and in a house-made, collagen hydroxyapatite scaffold. Using fluorescently-labelled cmRNA we observed an even distribution after loading complexes into the scaffold and a complete release after 3 days. For both monolayer and 3D culture, BMP-7 production peaked at 24 hours post-transfection, however cells transfected in scaffolds showed a sustained expression. BMP-7 transfected hMSCs yielded significantly higher ALP activity and Alizarin red staining at later timepoints compared to the untransfected group. Interestingly, BMP-7 cmRNA treatment triggered expression of osteogenic genes like OSX, RUNX-2 and OPN, which was also reflected in immunostainings. This work highlights the relevance of cmRNA technology that may overcome the shortcomings of protein delivery while circumventing issues of traditional pDNA-based gene therapy for bone regeneration.

Acknowledgement: This work has been performed as part of the cmRNAbone project and has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Grant Agreement No 874790.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a new class of drug that can be used to express a therapeutic protein and, in contrast to DNA, is safer and inexpensive. Among its advantages, mRNA will immediately begin to express its encoded protein in the cell cytoplasm. The protein will be expressed for a period of time, after which the mRNA is degraded. There is no risk of genetic damage, one of the concerns with plasmid DNA (pDNA) used in traditional gene therapy approaches. Nevertheless, mRNA application in tissue regeneration and regenerative medicine remains limited. In this case, mRNA must overcome its main hurdles: immunogenicity, lack of stability, and intracellular delivery. Research has been done to overcome these limitations, and the future of mRNA seems promising for tissue repair^1,2. This keynote talk will address questions including: What are the opportunities for mRNA to improve outcomes in musculoskeletal tissue repair, in particular bone and cartilage? What are the key factors and challenges to expediting this technology to patient treatment (beyond COVID-19 vaccination)?

Acknowledgements: E.R.B thanks the cmRNAbone project funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the grant agreement no. 874790 and the NIH R01 AR074395 from NIAMS for funding her mRNA work.

Bone tissue is known to possess an intrinsic regeneration potential. However, in cases of major injury, trauma, and disease, bone loss is present, and the regeneration potential of the tissue is often impaired. The process of bone regeneration relies on a complex interaction of molecules. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small, non-coding RNAs that inhibit messenger RNAs (mRNA). One miRNA can inhibit several mRNAs and one mRNA can be inhibited by several miRNAs. Functionally, miRNAs regulate the entire proteome via the local inhibition of translation. In fact, miRNA modulation has been shown to be involved in several musculoskeletal diseases¹. In those pathologies, they modulate the transcriptional activity of mRNAs important for differentiation, tissue-specific activity, extracellular matrix production, etc. Because of their function in inhibiting translation, miRNAs are being researched in many diseases and are already being used for interventional treatment². Bone tissue and its related conditions have been widely investigated up to this day^1,3. This talk will focus on the relevancy of miRNAs to bone tissue, its homeostasis, and disease. After, examples will be given of how miRNAs can be used in bone regeneration and diseases such as osteoporosis and osteosarcoma. The use of miRNAs in both, detection and therapy will be discussed.