Aims

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in approximately 1% to 2% of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) presenting multiple challenges, such as difficulty in diagnosis, technical complexity, and financial costs. Two-stage exchange is the gold standard for treating PJI but emerging evidence suggests 'two-in-one' single-stage revision as an alternative, delivering comparable outcomes, reduced morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. This study investigates five-year results of modified single-stage revision for treatment of PJI following TKA with bone loss.

Introduction

New implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are frequently introduced with the promise of improved performance. Infrequently there is accompanying data to document relative performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an implant widely used for decades (Existing TKA), compared to a new implant (New TKA) from the same manufacturer.

We report ten-year clinical and radiological follow-up data for the Sigma Press Fit Condylar total knee replacement system (Sigma PFC TKR). Between October 1998 and October 1999 a total of 235 consecutive PFC Sigma TKRs were carried out in 203 patients. Patients were seen at a specialist nurse-led clinic seven to ten days before admission and at six and 18 months, three, five and eight to ten years after surgery. Data were recorded prospectively at each clinic visit. Radiographs were obtained at the five- and eight- to ten-year follow-up appointments. Of the 203 patients, 147 (171 knees) were alive at ten years and 12 were lost to follow-up. A total of eight knees (3.4%) were revised, five for infection and three to change the polyethylene insert. The survival at ten years with an endpoint of revision for any reason was 95.9%, and with an endpoint of revision for aseptic failure was 98.7%. The mean American Knee Society Score (AKSS) was 79 (10 to 99) at eight to ten years, compared with 31 (2 to 62) pre-operatively. Of 109 knee with radiographs reviewed, 47 knees had radiolucent lines but none showed evidence of loosening.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:177–80.

This study reports the first 10-year clinical and radiological follow-up data for the Sigma PFC. The DuPuy Sigma total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a modification of the well established Press Fit Condylar (PFC) TKA and is used extensively in the UK and worldwide. It is the most commonly used TKA in England and Wales, where it accounts for 34% of all primary TKA.

A total of 235 consecutive Sigma TKAs were performed in 203 patients between October 1998 and October 1999, in our unit. Patients were seen at a specialist nurse led clinic 7 to 10 days before admission and at 6 months, 18 months, 3 years, 5 years and 7-10 years after surgery. Data was recorded prospectively at each clinic visit. Radiographs were obtained at the 5 year and 8-10 year follow-up appointment.

Of 235 knees 171 (147 patients) were alive at 10 years. Twelve were lost to follow up. Nine knees (3.8%) were revised; five for infection and four underwent change of polyethylene insert. Ten-year survival with and end point of revision for any reason was 95.9%, and with and endpoint of revision for aseptic failure was 98.7%. The mean American Knee Society score was 62 at 8-10 years compared with 31 out of 100 pre-operatively. Of 109 radiographs, 47 knees had radiolucent lines but none showed radiological evidence of loosening.

Our results show that the PFC Sigma knee arthroplasty performs well over the first 10 years post implantation.

Introduction

Revision knee arthroplasty is an increasingly common procedure and can be challenging in the presence of bone defects, ligament instability and soft-tissue deficiencies. Current treatment options in addressing tibial and femoral bone loss in the revision setting include cement, morselised or structural allograft, metal wedges and augments and custom or hinge prosthesis. The aim of this study is to describe our early experience using unique femoral and tibial metaphyseal sleeves as an alternate for dealing with significant tibial and femoral bone loss.

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome from total knee replacement (TKR) in young versus old patients in terms of pain and functional outcome.

We used our arthroplasty database which recorded prospectively pain and American Knee Society scores at regular intervals over ten years after TKR. The procedures used a modern, cemented resurfacing type cruciate retaining prosthesis. A cohort of young patients (≤55 years) were identified. A control group of patients > 56 was identified, matching for ASA, body mass index and underlying condition. Change over time was analysed using a factorial repeated measures ANOVA test, which allowed for investigation of difference between groups.

40 Knees in 26 patients were identified. 2 patients died prior to follow up, 2 were revised within the study period. (1 for infection at 2 years and one for change of poly at 7 years) and a further 4 were lost to follow up. 7 knees could not be matched and were excluded. This left a study group of 24 young and 24 older knees.

Pain scores (p=0.025) and American Knee Society “Knee” (p<0.001) and “Function” (p<0.001) scores changed significantly over time. There were however no statistical differences over the 10 year period in pain (p=0.436) and knee performance (0.618) but overall function was higher throughout the period in the younger group (=0.004).

Knee replacement in younger patients produces similar outcomes in terms of pain and function compared with older patients and TKR should not be withheld purely on account of age.