We prospectively evaluated four different microbiological tools for diagnostics of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), and assessed their impact on the categorization of infection according to EBJIS guidelines. We compared culture, in-house real-time mPCR for A total of 341 samples (sonication fluid, tissue biopsy, synovial fluid) were collected from 32 patients with suspected PJI who underwent 56 revision surgeries at the Orthopaedic Centre University Hospital Ljubljana, between 2022 and 2024. Samples were processed using standard protocols for routine culture, followed by DNA isolation using the MagnaPure24 (Roche). All samples were tested with mPCR, and an additional ≥4 samples from each revision (244 in total) were subjected to further metagenomic analysis. Culture results were considered positive if the same microorganism was detected in ≥2 samples, ≥50 CFU/ml were present in the sonication fluid, or ≥1 sample was positive for a more virulent microorganism or if the patient had received antibiotic treatment.Aim
Methods
To date, no ultimate diagnostic gold standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJI) has been established. In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a promising new tool, especially in culture-negative samples. In this prospective study, we performed metagenomic analysis using 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon NGS in samples from patients with suspected PJI. A total of 257 (187 culture-negative (CN) and 70 culture-positive (CP)) prospectively collected tissues and sonication fluid from 32 patients (56 revisions) were included. 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicons were sequenced using Illumina's MiSeq (California, USA) followed by bioinformatic analysis using nf-core/ampliseq pipeline.Aim
Methods
The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were pre-operatively evaluated as aseptic failure. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for presumed aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologicaly evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced.Aim
Method
Clear differentiation between aseptic failure and prosthetic joint infection remains one of the goals of modern orthopaedic surgery. New diagnostic methods can provide more precise evaluation of the etiology of prosthetic joint failure. With the introduction of sonication an increasing number of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection were detected. The aim of our study was to evaluate culture-negative prosthetic joint infections in patients who were preoperatively evaluated as aseptic failure. For the purpose of the study we included patients planed for revision surgery for presumed aseptic failure. Intraoperatively acquired samples of periprosthetic tissue and explanted prosthesis were microbiologically evaluated using standard microbiologic methods and sonication. If prosthetic joint infection was discovered, additional therapy was introduced.Aim
Method
