Hip arthroscopy is a rapidly expanding technique that has a steep learning curve. Simulation may have a role in helping trainees overcome this. However there is as yet no validated hip arthroscopy simulator. This study aimed to test the construct validity of a virtual reality hip arthroscopy simulator.

Nineteen orthopaedic surgeons performed a simulated arthroscopic examination of a healthy hip joint in the supine position. Surgeons were categorized as either expert (those who had performed 250 hip arthroscopies or more) or novice (those who had performed fewer than this). Twenty-one targets were visualized within joint; nine via the anterior portal, nine via the anterolateral and three via the posterolateral. This was followed by a task testing basic probe examination of the joint in which a series of eight targets were probed via the anterolateral portal. Each surgeon's performance was evaluated by the simulator using a set of pre-defined metrics including task duration, number of soft tissue & bone collisions, and distance travelled by instruments. No repeat attempts at the tasks were permitted. Construct validity was then evaluated by comparing novice and expert group performance metrics over the two tasks using the Mann–Whitney test, with a p value of less than 0.05 considered significant.

On the visualization task, the expert group outperformed the novice group on time taken (P=0.0003), number of collisions with soft tissue (P=0.001), number of collisions with bone (P=0.002) and distance travelled by the arthroscope (P=0.02). On the probe examination, the two groups differed only in the time taken to complete the task (P=0.025).

Increased experience in hip arthroscopy was reflected by significantly better performance on the VR simulator across two tasks, supporting its construct validity.

This study validates a virtual reality hip arthroscopy simulator and supports its potential for developing basic arthroscopic skills.

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of registration and the precision of the resection volume in navigated hip arthroscopy for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, using imageless and image-based registration. A virtual cam lesion was defined in 12 paired cadaver hips and randomly assigned to either imageless or image-based (three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy) navigated arthroscopic head–neck osteochondroplasty. The accuracy of patient–image registration for both protocols was evaluated and post-operative imaging was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the surgical resection. We found that the estimated accuracy of imageless registration in the arthroscopic setting was poor, with a mean error of 5.6 mm (standard deviation (sd) 4.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.14 to 7.19). Because of the significant mismatch between the actual position of the probe during surgery and the position of that probe as displayed on the navigation platform screen, navigated femoral osteochondroplasty was physically impossible. The estimated accuracy of image-based registration by means of 3D fluoroscopy had a mean error of 0.8 mm (sd 0.51; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.94). In terms of the volume of bony resection, a mean of 17% (sd 11; -6% to 28%) more bone was resected than with the virtual plan (p = 0.02). The resection was a mean of 1 mm deeper (sd 0.7; -0.3 to 1.6) larger than on the original virtual plan (p = 0.02).

In conclusion, given the limited femoral surface that can be reached and digitised during arthroscopy of the hip, imageless registration is inaccurate and does not allow for reliable surgical navigation. However, image-based registration does acceptably allow for guided femoral osteochondroplasty in the arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement.