Recurrent groin pain following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a challenging problem. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the position and dynamics of the psoas tendon as a potential cause for recurrent groin pain following PAO. Patients with recurrent groin pain following PAO were identified from a single surgeon series. A total of 13 patients with 18 hips (4.7%) out of a 386 PAO, had recurrent groin pain. Muscle path of the psoas tendon was accurately represented using 3D models from CT data were created with Mimics software. A validated discrete element model using rigid body springs was used to predict psoas tendon movement during hip circumduction and walking.Abstract
Introduction
Methods
A deep squat (DS) is a challenging motion at the level of the hip joint generating substantial reaction forces (HJRF). As a closed chain exercise, it has great value in rehabilitation and muscle strengthening of hip and knee. During DS, the hip flexion angle approximates the functional range of hip motion risking femoroacetabular impingement in some morphologies. In-vivo HJRF measurements have been limited to instrumented implants in a limited number of older patients performing incomplete squats (< 50° hip flexion and < 80° knee flexion). On the other hand, total hip arthroplasty is being increasingly performed in a younger and higher demanding patient population. These patients clearly have a different kinetical profile with hip and knee flexion ranges going well over 100 degrees. Since measurements of HJRF with instrumented prostheses in healthy subjects would be ethically unfeasible, this study aims to report a personalised numerical solution based on inverse dynamics to calculate realistic in-silico HJRF values during DS. Thirty-five healthy males (18–25 years old) were prospectively recruited for motion and morphological analysis. DS motion capture (MoCap) acquisitions and MRI scans with gait lab marker positions were obtained. The AnyBody Modelling System (v6.1.1) was used to implement a novel personalisation workflow of the AnyMoCap template model. Bone geometries, semi-automatically segmented from MRI, and corresponding markers were incorporated into the template human model by an automated procedure. A state of-the-art TLEM 2.0 dataset, included in the Anybody Managed Model Repository (v2.0), was used in the template model. The subject-specific MoCap trials were processed to compute kinematics of DS, muscle and joint reaction forces in the entire body. Resulting hip joint loads were compared with in-vivo data from OrthoLoad dataset. Additionally, hip and knee joint angles were computed.Introduction
Material and methods
