Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical procedures. The objectives of this study were to define whether there is a correlation between socioeconomic status (SES) and surgical complications after elective primary unilateral THA, and investigate whether access to elective THA differs within SES groups. We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study involving 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, over a 17-year period. Patients were divided into income quintiles based on postal codes as a proxy for personal economic status. Multivariable logistic regression models were then used to primarily assess the relationship between SES and surgical complications within one year of index THA.Aims
Methods
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual-mobility components (DM-THA) has been shown to decrease the risk of dislocation in the setting of a displaced neck of femur fracture compared to conventional single-bearing THA (SB-THA). This study assesses if the clinical benefit of a reduced dislocation rate can justify the incremental cost increase of DM-THA compared to SB-THA. Costs and benefits were established for patients aged 75 to 79 years over a five-year time period in the base case from the Canadian Health Payer’s perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the base case model conclusions.Aims
Methods
We present the results, in terms of survival, clinical outcome, and radiological appearance at 20 years, in a cohort of 225 cemented Exeter Universal femoral components (Stryker, Newbury, UK) implanted in 207 patients, at a district general hospital. All patients in this study had a total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an Exeter Universal femoral component with a cemented (n = 215) or cementless (n = 10) acetabular component. Clinical and radiological data were collected prospectively at one year, five years, and every five years thereafter. Patients lost to radiological and clinical follow-up (five) were cross-referenced with National Joint Registry (NJR) data and general practitioner (GP) records to assess whether they had undergone revision for any reason.Aims
Methods
The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA. We developed a Markov model to estimate the expected cost and benefits of dual mobility compared with single bearing implants in patients undergoing revision THA. The rates of revision and further revision were calculated from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, while rates of transition from one health state to another were estimated from the literature, and the data were stratified by sex and age. Implant and healthcare costs were estimated from local procurement prices and national tariffs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published utility estimates for patients undergoing THA.Aims
Methods
A randomized trial was designed to compare the outcome of ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic on conventional polyethylene. These patients have been followed for 15 years. 58 hips in 57 patients under 60 years of age were randomized into one of two groups. Patients were blinded to the type of hip they received. Both groups of patients were treated routinely with prophylactic peri-operative antibiotics and low molecular weight Heparin. All patients were seen at six weeks, three months and annually after surgery. Clinical and radiologic assessment was carried out at each visit. Fifty-eight hips were available for analysis, 28 in the CoP group and 29 patients in the CoC group. Mean age of both groups was less than 45 years. There were seven revisions (16%) among the 58 patients enrolled in the study. In the CoP group four patients underwent revision with head and liner exchange for eccentric polyethylene wear 16 years post-implantation. In the CoC group one patient had a cup revision at 15 years for acute aseptic instability of the acetabulum; two additional patients in the CoC group had femoral head exchange, one for fracture and one for trunnion corrosion. Both occurred 14 years after the index surgery. Functional outcome scores showed no difference between the two groups at 15 years. Radiographically there was a statistically difference in wear between the two groups. This study demonstrates that both ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene produce satisfactory functional results with low revision rates in young patients.
We present the ten-year data of a cohort of patients, aged between
18 and 65 years (mean age 52.7 years; 19 to 64), who underwent total
hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomised to be treated with a
cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral head with an ultra-high molecular weight
polyethylene (UHMWPE), highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) or
ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surface. A total of 102 hips (91 patients) were randomised into the three
groups. At ten years, 97 hips were available for radiological and
functional follow-up. Two hips (two patients) had been revised (one
with deep infection and one for periprosthetic fracture) and three
were lost to follow-up. Radiological analysis was performed using
a validated digital assessment programme to give linear, directional
and volumetric wear of the two polyethylene groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
Several implants have a proven track record of durability and function in patients over many years. As manufacturers' patents expire it is understandable that cheaper generic copies would be considered. There is currently no established, independent method of determining design equivalence between generic and branded orthopaedic implants. We acquired 10 boxed, as manufactured components consisting of the generic OptiStem XTR model (n=5) and branded Exeter (n=5) femoral stems. Two examiners were blinded to the implant design and independently measured the mass, volume, trunnion surface topography, roughness, trunnion cone angle, CCD angle and femoral offset using peer-reviewed methods. We then compared the stems using these parameters. We found that the OptiStems (1) were lighter (p<0.001) (2) had a rougher trunnion surface (p<0.001) with a greater spacing and depth of the machined threads (p<0.001), (3) had greater trunnion cone angles (p=0.007) and (4) a smaller radius at the top of the trunnion (p=0.007). There was no difference for stem volume (p=0.643), CCD angle (p=0.788) or offset (p=0.993). This study is the first independent investigation of the equivalence of a generic orthopaedic implant to its branded design. We found a clear difference in trunnion roughness, trunnion cone angle and radius, and implant mass when comparing the two generic and branded stem designs. All implants require standard regulatory processes to be followed. It does not appear feasible that generic implants can be manufactured to predictability guarantee the same performance as generic drugs. We found a number of physical differences between the generic and branded implants. Whilst both designs are likely to work in clinical practice, they are different.
The aim of this study was to compare the design of the generic
OptiStem XTR femoral stem with the established Exeter femoral stem. We obtained five boxed, as manufactured, implants of both designs
at random (ten in total). Two examiners were blinded to the implant
design and independently measured the mass, volume, trunnion surface
topography, trunnion roughness, trunnion cone angle, Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal
(CCD) angle, femoral offset, stem length, neck length, and the width
and roughness of the polished stem shaft using peer-reviewed methods.
We then compared the stems using these parameters.Aims
Materials and Methods
