Ceramic bearing fractures are rare events, but mandate revision and implantation of new bearings. Revisions using metal heads have been reported to lead to gross volumetric head wear (due to abrasive retained ceramic micro-debris), cobalt toxicity, multi-organ failure and death. Such complications are widely published (50+ reports), yet we know that patients continue to be put at risk. Using data from the NJR and AOANJRR, this study seeks to compare the risk of re-revision and death by revision bearing combination following a ceramic bearing fracture. Data were extracted from the NJR and AOANJRR, identifying revisions for ceramic bearing fracture. Subsequent outcomes of survival, re-revision and death were compared between revision bearing combinations (ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-polyethylene, and metal-on-polyethylene). 366 cases were available for analysis from the NJR dataset (MoP=34, CoP=112, CoC=221) and 174 from the AOANJRR dataset (MoP=17, CoP=44, CoC=113). The overall incidence rate of adverse outcome (revision or death) was 0.65 for metal heads and 0.23 for ceramic head articulations (p=0.0012) across the whole time period (NJR). Kaplan-Meir survival estimates demonstrate an increased risk of both re-revision and death where a metal head has been used vs a ceramic head following revision for ceramic fracture. There are few decisions in arthroplasty surgery that can lead to serious harm or death for our patients, but revision using a metal head following ceramic bearing fracture is one of them. This study enhances the signal of what is already known but previously only reported as inherently low-level evidence (case reports and small series) due to event rarity. Use of a metal head in revision for ceramic fracture represents an avoidable patient safety issue, which revision guidelines should seek to address.
Renal impairment following major surgery is a formidable complication. There is recent evidence suggesting increasing risk of progression to chronic kidney disease and mortality after transient renal impairment. We aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-operative comorbidities on long-term outcomes of renal-function following hip arthroplasty. Patients listed for hip arthroplasty were pre-assessed according to the Charlson-Comorbidity-index (CCI) in May 2017. Demographic data, established risk factors and preoperative renal-function were collected. Pre-existing renal dysfunction was classified using KDIGO CKD criteria. RIFLE AKIN scores were used to document post-operative renal impairment based on 7-day serum creatinine. Renal function was assessed at 30 day and 1 year. Risk for early and long-term-complications were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. Mortality and kidney-disease-progression were estimated using Kaplan Meier plotsIntroduction
Method
