The major function of the medial meniscus has been shown to be distribution of the load with reduction of cartilage stresses, while its role in AP stability has been found to be secondary. However several recent studies have shown that cartilage loss in OA occurs in the central region of the tibia while the meniscus is displaced medially. In a lab study (Arno, Hadley 2013) it was confirmed that the AP laxity was greatly reduced with a compressive force across the knee, while the femur shifted posteriorly and the AP laxity was increased after a partial meniscetomy of the posterior horn. It is therefore possible that under load, the compression of the meniscus and the cartilage, 2–3mm in total, allows load transmission on the central tibial plateau, and causes radial expansion and tension of the meniscus providing restraint to femoral displacements. This leads to our hypotheses that the highest loading on the medial meniscus would be at the extremes of motion, rather than in the mid-range, and that the meniscus would provide the majority of the restraint to anterior-posterior femoral displacements throughout flexion when compressive loads were acting. MRI scans were taken of ten knee specimens to verify the absence of pathology and produce computer models. The knees were loaded in combinations of compressive and shear loading over a full flexion range. Tekscan sensors were used to measure the pressure distribution across the joint as the knee was flexed continuously. A digital camera was used to track the motion, from which femoral-tibial contacts were determined by computer modelling. Load transmission was determined from the Tekscan for the anterior horn, central body, posterior horn, and the uncovered cartilage in the center of the meniscus. An analysis was carried out (Fig 2) to determine the net anterior or posterior shear force carried by the meniscus.Introduction
Methods & Materials
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), has now become a reliable, successful, and widely used treatment for osteoarthritis. Numerous reports indicate that for the majority of patients, the TKA lasts a lifetime with pain relief and the ability to perform most everyday activities. However there are a number of ways in which the procedure can be further improved, the focus here being on function. One of the problems in evaluating function is that it depends upon the inherent ability, motivation, and expectation of the patients. There are several well-used questionnaire systems which capture functional ability objectively. In the effort to simplify evaluation, a ‘forgotten knee’ evaluation has been introduced, the concept being that ‘the ideal TKA design’ would feel and function like a normal knee. Such a measure would include factors such as surgical technique, alignment, and rehabilitation, as well as the TKA design itself. Another approach to evaluation is to measure biomechanical parameters, such as in gait analysis and fluoroscopy, which evaluate kinematic or kinematic parameters, using normal controls for comparison. Nevertheless, such evaluations still include factors other than the TKA design itself, and do not apply to new designs. The approach taken here for the evaluation of a new TKA design independent of other factors, is to measure the neutral path of motion and the laxity boundaries of the loaded knee on the application of shear and torque over a full range of flexion. The benchmark is the same kinematic data from the normal intact knee. The rationale has some analogy to the ‘forgotten knee’ in that if the laxity response of a design of TKA is the same as that of the anatomic knee itself, the behavior of that implanted knee in any functional condition will be indistinguishable from that of the anatomic knee itself. Such a testing concept has some similarities to the constraint test described in the ASTM standard. In this paper, a novel design algorithm is proposed for creating different design concepts. First, a general morphological form is formulated for each design concept, a Cam-Post PS, a Saddle-Ramp, and a Converging Condyle, all with overall anatomic-like surfaces. Each femoral component is then designed, which is then moved through the normal neutral path and laxity paths, which creates the tibial surface. The concepts are evaluated using a Desktop Knee Machine configured to move the knee dynamically through full flexion while applying combinations of compression, shear and torque; kinematic data being captured optically and plotted using custom software. The normal benchmark was obtained from 10 normal knee specimens, which showed the restraint of the medial femoral condyle to anterior displacement and the overall rollback and laxity laterally. Compared with standard CR and PS designs, the Guided Motion designs were seen to more closely resemble normal. It is proposed that this approach can result in designs which will more likely reproduce a ‘forgotten knee’ and achieve the optimal function for a given patient.
The purpose of this study was to determine if a short femoral stem (Lima Corporate, Udine, Italy) would result in a strain distribution which mimicked the intact bone better than a traditional length stem, thereby eliminating the potential for stress-shielding. A 2 mm thick moldable plastic (PL-1, Vishay Micromeasurements, Raleigh, NC) was contoured to six fourth-generation composite femoral bones (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA). The intact femurs were then loaded (82 kg) in a rig which simulated mid-stance single limb support phase of gait (Figure 1). During testing, the femurs were viewed and video recorded through a model 031 reflection polariscope. Observing the photoelastic coating through the polariscope, a series of fringes could be seen, which represented the difference in principal strain along the femur. The fringes were quantified using Fringe Order, N, as per the manufacturers technical notes. In order to analyze the strain distribution, the femur was separated into 6 zones, 3 lateral and 3 medial, and the maximum fringe order determined. Upon completion of testing of the intact femur, the short length femoral stem was inserted and tested, and finally the traditional length femoral stem was inserted and tested. Anterior and lateral radiographs were obtained of the femur with each femoral stem in order to confirm proper alignment.INTRODUCTION:
METHODS:
