Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Oct 2017
Aranganathan S Maccabe T George J Hassan H Poyser E Edwards C Parfitt D
Full Access

Outsourcing elective surgery has become increasingly commonplace to meet increasing demand from a growing & aging population. There is concern that outsourcing was influencing the nature of residual workload that was unsuitable for treatment elsewhere. This led to the impression that our unit is operating on more complex patients orthopaedic problems, ASA and Body Mass Index (BMI). By losing a disproportionate number of straightforward patients our department's outcomes, productivity and training opportunities could be adversely affected.

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of primary hip / knee arthroplasties between July & December for 2014(pre-outsourcing), 2015 and 2016(post-outsourcing). ANOVA, Tukey Honest Significant Difference(HSD) and Pearson's correlation used.

Total of 726 primary arthroplasties were performed with an almost 50 % reduction post outsourcing. Post-outsourcing, BMI and ASA were significantly worse with a ANOVA of p=0.001 and HSD p=0.003. Length of stay increased from 5.4 days in 2014 to 6.2 days in 2015 ANOVA p< 0.001 but decreased in 2016. BMI significantly affected operating time (Pearson's r =0.12, p< 0.05) and anaesthetic time (Pearson's r =0.19, p< 0.05). ASA significantly affected length of hospital stay, p< 0.01 and operation time, p=0.007 but no effect on anaesthetic time.

In conclusion, we are operating on more complex patients due to current outsourcing setup. Implications for short-term were on anaesthetic and operation time, inpatient stay and training opportunity were affected, with possible long-term implications on individual surgeon and unit outcomes (complications, patient satisfaction).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 9 - 9
1 Dec 2014
Aranganathan S Carpenter C Thomas D Hemmadi S O'Doherty D
Full Access

Complex congenital foot deformities pose a challenge to the surgeon due to poor results after extensive surgery. We report the clinical outcomes of children with complex congenital foot deformities treated with UMEX® (Universal mini-external fixator System) frames.

This is a prospective review of our experience in patients treated in this way, from 2004 to 2011. The indications for treatment included resistant/recurrent Congenital Talipes Equino Varus (CTEV), cavo-varus deformity secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, arthrogryposis, fibular hemimelia and other congenital abnormalities. A total of 32 children (35 feet) have been treated, out of which 22 were male and 10 were female patients. Age at surgery ranged from 3 to 15 years (median age – 7 years). Three patients underwent bilateral procedures; the reminder (29 patients) underwent unilateral foot operations. Twenty-eight patients had undergone previous surgery including soft-tissue and/or bony corrective procedures.

The frames were removed at an average of 69 days after application, and the patients spent a further 6 weeks in a walking cast. Good functional outcomes were noted in 26 patients in the first postoperative year and in 19 patients in the fifth postoperative year. Further operations were needed in 10 patients. Complications occurred in 10 patients, predominantly pin-site infections and 1 case of bony overgrowth at pin-site and 1 of proximal tibio-fibular diastasis.

This is a simple fixator to use with a short learning curve. In groups of patients with complex congenital abnormalities, we achieved good functional outcome with low-complication rates.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Dec 2014
Thati S Aranganathan S Ganapathi M
Full Access

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is the latest advancement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which claims to improve alignment, simplify the surgical process, forecasts the component size and reduces the operating time. We discuss our experience of preoperative planning using default settings and making changes where necessary.

We analysed prospectively collected data in 100 consecutive PSI knee replacements (Zimmer®) performed in our institute during the period February to August 2012. All patients underwent MRI scans of the ipsilateral hip, knee and ankle joints. From the images, Materialise® (Leuven, Belgium) provided 3D model of the knee on which preoperative planning was done using PSI software. All default plans were checked and appropriate changes were made before the senior author approved final plan for preparation of patient specific moulds.

We made 636 changes (6.36 changes per knee) preoperatively from the default settings. In only 4% of the patients, the primary cuts needed revision. Thus in 96% of the cases, the primary cuts allowed optimal alignment and gap balancing with appropriate soft tissue release. Our preoperative planning predicted 99% of femoral and 98% of tibial component sizes definitively implanted.

Our results show the importance of the surgeon's input in approving preoperative planning with this technique.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Feb 2013
Aranganathan S Carpenter C Thomas D Hemmadi S O'Doherty D
Full Access

We report the clinical outcomes of children with complex congenital foot deformities treated with UMEX® mini-external fixators. This is a prospective review of our experience in patients treated in this way, from 2004. The indications for treatment were resistant/recurrent Congenital Talus Equina Varus(CTEV), cavo-varus deformity secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, arthrogryposis, fibular hemimelia and other congenital abnormalities. In addition, one patient underwent this treatment since he was allergic to casting material.

A total of 32 children (35 feet) have been treated, with a male to female ratio of 22:10 respectively. The patient-age at operation ranged between 3 and 15 years (median age −7 years). Three patients underwent bilateral procedures and 29 patients underwent unilateral foot operations. Twenty-eight patients underwent previous soft-tissue and bony corrective operations with serial casting. The frames were removed at an average of 69 days after application with a further 6 weeks in a walking cast. Seventy-nine percent of the patients had good functional outcome. Further operations were needed in 10 patients. Complications occurred in 10 patients, including pin-site infections, bony overgrowth at pin-site and proximal tibio-fibular diastasis.

In conclusion, this is a simple fixator to use with a small learning curve. In groups of patients with complex congenital abnormalities, we achieved good functional outcome with low-complication rates.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 100 - 100
1 Sep 2012
Lakkol S Aranganathan S Reddy G Taranu R Friesem T
Full Access

Introduction

In the last decade, single level cervical arthroplasty has proven its efficacy as one of the surgical treatment option for for patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc disease. Recent published reports on multilevel cervical arthroplasty using single implants have shown statistically significant results when compared to single level surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of multilevel cervical arthroplasty to single level cervical arthroplasty, when more than one type of implants were used.

Methods

This is a prospective study of consecutive patients who presented to our unit in between June 2006 and November 2009. The maximum follow-up period was 51 months (mean=18 months). Several types of cervical arthroplasty devices have been used in this study. The clinical outcome measures such as Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP); Neck disability Index (NDI) and the Bodily pain component of Short Form 36 questionnaires were recorded pre and post operatively. After confirming the normality of the data appropriate parametric (paired t-test) were used to assess the statistical significance (p< 0.05) between pre and post-operative values. Two sample T-test was used to assess the significance between the differences in mean scores between each group.