Day case surgery is commonplace in the field of orthopaedic surgery, being suitable for a wide range of both trauma &
elective procedures. It became apparent within our unit that an unacceptably high number of cases were being cancelled for a variety of reasons. We set out to identify these reasons and thereby develop a simple screening process to reduce the number of cancellations. Initial audit over a 1 year period showed 25% of the 907 day case patients were being cancelled. We subdivided the reasons for these cancellations at both pre-operative assessment and on the day of surgery into avoidable [e.g. no carer / telephone, uncontrolled BP, high BMI and ischaemic heart disease] and unavoidable [e.g. surgery no longer required, patient unwell, list cancelled for emergencies, patient DNA]. The majority of our cancellations fell into the “avoidable” category, predominantly at pre-operative assessment. Accordingly, we devised a simple screening questionnaire to be used by clinicians in out-patients at the time of listing for surgery, based on the RCS guidelines (1985). If any of the questions were answered “Yes”, the patient was not suitable for day case surgery. The patient information letter was also changed, informing patients that non-attendance would result in their removal from the waiting list. Re-audit of 727 patients over the next 12 months showed a fall in cancellations to only 11%, with the majority of these being for unavoidable reasons. Cancellations are a source of inconvenience, distress and frustration to both clinician and patient, are a waste of hospital time and resources, and lead to an increase in waiting lists. Our study demonstrates the value of closing the loop in audit, leading to a dramatic reduction in cancellations. Audit is a useful tool to improve patient care, and is not merely a “number-crunching” exercise.
Total knee arthroplasty is sometimes associated with excessive bleeding necessitating blood transfusion. Transfusion is associated with risk of disease transmission and immunological burden to the recipient.
We present the results of the first two years of experience with the Weil osteotomy at The Royal Oldham Hospital and endeavour to define its role in the management of intractable plantar keratosis (IPK) and complication rate. All patients undergoing Weil osteotomy in 2000 &
2001 were included in this prospective study. A total of 21 consecutive patients, having 61 lesser metatarsal osteotomies were reviewed (95% female). The mean age was 62 years (range 12 to 86). The mean follow-up period was 17 months (range seven to 28 months). Fourteen patients (66%) had no previous foot surgery. In 11 patients (53%) only Weil osteotomy was performed; in the other 10 patients (47%) the procedure was combined with surgery to the first ray for the correction of hallux valgus deformity. There were no major complications. Superficial wound infections in four (19%) patients were treated successfully with antibiotics. No screws needed to be removed and no non-union / avascular necrosis were seen. Only one patient was left with residual pain and stiffness on ambulation but the rest (95%) were able to walk comfortably in either normal shoe wear or trainers. We found that the patients consistently reported pain relief although some stiffness of the toes may remain. The majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome in terms of symptoms and function when evaluated by using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scoring system. Excellent results (90–100 points) were achieved in 10 patients (47%), good (80–89 points) in six patients (28%), fair (70–79 points) in four (20%) and poor (less than 70 points) in only one patient (5%). We conclude that although there is a considerable learning curve that must be overcome the Weil osteotomy can be a reliable procedure that effectively reduce the load under the lesser metatarsal heads.
Some radiological features of the lumbar spine of 84 patients with spastic diplegia were compared with 50 control subjects. The average age of the patients was 20.1 years (3 to 39). Spondylolysis of the fifth lumbar vertebra was found in 21%, four times more frequently than in normal subjects. No patient under nine years of age had spondylolysis and the frequency increased with age. The average angle of lumbar lordosis in spastic patients in the standing position was greater than in normal subjects, and increased with age. The patients had a decreased sacrofemoral angle which caused an increase in Ferguson's angle and explained the increased angle of lumbar lordosis.
We performed Kawamura's dome osteotomy of the pelvis, with simultaneous distal transfer of the greater trochanter on 101 hips in 91 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia. The mean age at operation was 30 years (15 to 55), and follow-up was for a mean of 8.3 years (5 to 14). Clinical evaluation using the Merle d'Aubigne score showed 92% excellent or good results. Radiologically, 91 hips had good acetabular remodelling and showed no signs of progression of osteoarthritis. In ten hips the osteoarthritic process progressed despite the osteotomy and six of these eventually underwent total hip replacement. Factors which were significantly associated with a poor outcome included an advanced stage of osteoarthritis, valgus deformity of the proximal femur, old age at the time of operation and postoperative persistence of abductor insufficiency.