Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its perceived benefits over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), such as greater bone preservation, reduced operating-room time, better post-operative range of motion and improved gait. However there have been failures associated with UKA caused by misalignment of the implants that have lead to revisions. To improve the implant alignment a robotic guidance system called the RIO Robotic Arm has been developed by MAKO Surgical Corp (Ft. Lauderdale, FL), which is designed to give improved accuracy compared to traditional UKA using cutting jigs and other manual instrumentation.

The University of Strathclyde in association with Glasgow Royal Infirmary has undertaken the first independent RCT trial of the MAKO system against the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty – a conventional UKA used in the UK. Motion analysis was used in order to obtain a quantitative assessment of their movement. The results from a total of 51 patients (23 MAKO, 28 Oxford) that underwent a one year post-operative biomechanical assessment were investigated.

Motion analysis showed that during level walking the MAKO group achieved a higher knee excursion during the highest flexion portion of the weight bearing stage of the gait cycle (foot-strike to mid-stance) compared to the Oxford group (18.6° and 15.8° respectively). This difference was statistically significant (p-value = 0.03). Other knee excursion values that were compared were from mid-stance to terminal stance, and overall knee flexion. No statistically significant differences were seen in either of these measurements. A subsequent comparison of both MAKO and Oxford groups with a matched normal cohort (50 patients), demonstrated that there wasn't a statistically significant difference between the MAKO group and the normal knees during mean knee excursion from foot-strike to mid-stance (18.6° and 19.5° respectively, p-value 0.36). However the Oxford group, with a lower knee excursion was found to be significantly different to our normal control group (15.8° and 19.5° respectively, p-value < 0.001).

This suggests that the robotic-assisted knees behaved more similarly to normal gait during this phase of the gait cycle than those of the conventional group. While significant differences in gait were found between the Oxford and MAKO groups, further work is required to determine if this results in improved knee function that is perceptible to the patient.

Introduction

Acute renal dysfunction (ARD) following orthopaedic surgery is known to increase morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of new acute post-operative renal dysfunction between two cohorts of elective orthopaedic surgical patients receiving either cefuroxime or a combination of gentamicin and flucloxacillin as prophylactic antibiotic regimes. The study was initiated following a change in antibiotic prophylaxis within our unit from cefuroxime to gentamicin and flucloxacillin.

A retrospective analysis was carried out to determine the influence of pre-existing spinal pathology on the outcome of Total Knee Replacement surgery. Data was collected from 345 patients who had undergone Total Knee Replacement, at four centres in the UK, between 2000 and 2007. Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), American Knee Society Scores (AKSS) and SF-12 questionnaires were recorded prospectively. Data was collected pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. Patients were divided into those with (n=40) and without a history of low back pain (n=305). In addition to determining the influence of low back pain on outcome after Total Knee Replacement we also examined the influence of concomitant hip and ankle pathology in the same cohort of patients.

OKS scores were significantly worse for patients with symptomatic low back pain at 3 (p=0.05), 12 (p=0.009) and 24 months (p=0.039) following surgery. SF-12 physical scores followed a comparable pattern with significance demonstrated at 3 (p=0.038), 12 (p=0.0002) and 24 months (p=0.016). AKSS followed a similar pattern, but significance was only reached at 1 year (p=0.013). The mental component of the SF-12 measure demonstrated a significant improvement in patients' mental health post-operatively for patients with no history of low back pain. In contrast patients with low back pain showed no improvement in mental health scores post-operatively.

In contrast to low back pain, hip and ankle pathology had no statistically significant detrimental effect on the outcome of Total Knee Replacement surgery.

This study demonstrates that low back pain significantly affects the functional outcome after Total Knee Replacement surgery and that patients with low back pain show no improvement in mental health post-operatively.