To analyse the available rotating hinge knee implants available on the market with a view to deriving a rational algorithm for implant selection. Information on available hinge designs was gathered from the literature and further questionnaires were sent to the relevant implant companies asking for more specific information regarding the minimum bone resection necessary to accommodate the implant, the maximum bone loss that can be compensated with augments, method of transmission of forces, type and size of stems, availability of metaphyseal-filling cones and cost.Aim
Method
Patello-femoral arthritis can result in a considerable thinning of the patella. The restoration of an adequate patella thickness is key to the successful outcome of knee arthroplasty. The objectives were (1) to establish a reproducible patella width:thickness index including chondral surface and (2) to investigate whether there is a difference between bone alone and bone/chondral construct thickness as shown by MRI. Forty three MRI scans of young adults, mean age 27 (range 17–38), 34 male and 9 female, were studied. Exclusion criteria included degenerative joint disease, patello-femoral pathology or age under 16/over 40 (102 patients). The bony and chondral thickness of the patella and its width were measured. Inter/intra observer variability was calculated and correlation analysis performed. We found a strong correlation between patella plus cartilage thickness and width (Pearson 0.75, P < 0.001). The mean width:thickness ratio was 1.8 (SD 0.10, 95% CI 1.77–1.83). Without cartilage the ratio was 2.16 (SD 0.15, 95% CI 2.11–2.21), correlation was moderate (Pearson 0.68, P < 0.001). The average patella cartilage thickness was 4.1mm (SD 1.1, 95% CI 3.8–4.5). The narrow confidence intervals for the ratio of patella width:thickness suggest that patella width can be used as a guide to accurate restoration of patella thickness during total knee or patella-femoral replacement. We would recommend a ratio of 1.8:1.
This study is a prospective analysis of clinical outcome in 201 consecutive patients treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus graft between October 2005 and January 2011. Patients received pre and post-operative clinical evaluation, radiological assessment and outcome scoring systems. 193 patients (92 male, 119 female) underwent 211 procedures, with mean age 26 (16–49) and follow-up 16 months (6–42 months). Indications were atraumatic recurrent patella dislocation (68%), traumatic recurrent dislocation (22.8%), instability (5%), single dislocation (2.7%) and anterior knee pain (1.4%). Trochlea dysplasia was moderate in 57% and mild in 35%. There have been no recurrent dislocations/ subluxations. 10 patients have required further surgery. The mean pre-op Kujala Scores were 55 (SE 5.21) and post-op scores improved to mean 82 (31–100) (SE 1.18)(p < 0.001). This improvement and significance is mirrored with Oxford (27 to 41), WOMAC (76 to 93), Fulkerson (53 to 83), IKDC (46 to 75), Tegner (4.1 to 5.3) and SF12 (38 to 51) scores (p < 0.005). 93% of patients were satisfied with their operation. History of prior realignment surgery was associated with significantly worse outcomes compared to patients where MPFL reconstruction was their first realignment procedure (p < 0.05). This series is the largest reported in the literature for any technique of MPFL surgery. This technique allows for objective intra-operative evaluation of the required graft tension to optimise patella tracking.
We report a prospective analysis of clinical
outcome in patients treated with medial patellofemoral ligament
(MPFL) reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus graft.
The technique includes superolateral portal arthroscopic assessment
before and after graft placement to ensure correct graft tension
and patellar tracking before fixation. Between October 2005 and
October 2010, a total of 201 consecutive patients underwent 219 procedures.
Follow-up is presented for 211 procedures in 193 patients with a
mean age of 26 years (16 to 49), and mean follow-up of 16 months
(6 to 42). Indications were atraumatic recurrent patellar dislocation
in 141 patients, traumatic recurrent dislocation in 50, pain with
subluxation in 14 and a single dislocation with persistent instability
in six. There have been no recurrent dislocations/subluxations.
There was a statistically significant improvement between available pre-
and post-operative outcome scores for 193 patients (all p <
0.001).
Female patients with a history of atraumatic recurrent dislocation
and all patients with history of previous surgery had a significantly
worse outcome (all p <
0.05). The indication for surgery, degree
of dysplasia, associated patella alta, time from primary dislocation
to surgery and evidence of associated cartilage damage at operation
did not result in any significant difference in outcome. This series adds considerably to existing evidence that MPFL
reconstruction is an effective surgical procedure for selected patients
with patellofemoral instability.