Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 89 - 89
1 Sep 2012
Ackermann P Schizas N Bring D Li J Andersson T Fahlgren A Aspenberg P
Full Access

Introduction

Traumatized musculoskeletal tissue often exhibits prolonged time to healing, mostly due to low blood flow and innervation. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) increases blood flow and decreases thromboembolic event after orthopedic surgery,[1] however little is known about healing effects.[2] We hypothesized that IPC could stimulate tissue repair: 1.) blood flow 2.) nerve ingrowth 3.) tissue proliferation and during immobilisation enhance 4.) biomechanical tissue properties.

Methods

Study 1: In 104 male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats the right Achilles tendon was ruptured and the animals freely mobilized. Half the group received daily IPC-treatment, using a pump and cuff over the hindpaw that inflates/deflates cyclicly, 0–55mmHg (Biopress SystemTM, Flexcell Int.), and the other half received sham-treatment. Healing was assessed at 1,3,6 weeks by perfusion-analysis with laser doppler scanner (Perimed, Sweden), histology and biomechanical testing.

Study 2: 48 male SD-rats were ruptured as above. Three groups of each 16 rats were either mobilized, immobilized or immobilized with IPC treatment. Immobilization was performed by plaster cast. Healing was assessed at 2 weeks with histology and biomechanical testing.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 211 - 211
1 May 2006
Rydholm U Andersson T Linder L Maxander P Besjakov J Montgomery F Carlsson A
Full Access

25 RA patients with their ankles fused with an intramedullary nail were compared to 35 RA patients with their ankles fused with compression screws.

24/25 nailed patients showed radiographic healing at follow-up after 3 (1–8) years, and 26/35 ankles in the compression screw group examined after 6 (1–14) years healed after the first attempt and another 5 after repeat surgery.

In the nailed group 23 patients were satisfied and 2 somewhat satisfied. In the compression screw group 20 were satisfied, 12 somewhat satisfied and 3 dissatisfied.

There were 4 deep infections (3 healed after nail extraction and antibiotics, one unhealed) in the nail group and 1 deep infection (healed after antibiotics) in the compression screw group.

Six patients in the nailed group also had a permanent plantar sensory loss.

Conclusion: Ankle fusion with retrograde intramedullary nailing seems to result in a high rate of healing and satisfied patients, but cares a substantial risk of deep infection compared to fusion with compression screws, which has a lower fusion rate fewer satisfied patients, but less complications.

RA patients with a normal subtalar joint are of course only managed by compression screws.